Spending money, if you stop and think about it, only transfers that money to someone else. The money is still there, its quantity hasn’t changed, but it’s just in a different person’s bank account or wallet now. That’s fundamentally why money can’t “flow into” an asset. If you buy an asset, that money you spent is still available to spend, just by someone else rather than by you. It’s not somehow sitting there inside the stock or bond or real estate, waiting for you to sell your asset so it can emerge back into the financial landscape and be spent again.
Discussion
Understanding this would dispense with a lot of financial jargon and nonsense that prevents people from understanding markets and price movements.
nostr:nevent1qvzqqqpxfgpzp0rve5f6xtu56djkfkkg7ktr5rtfckpun95rgxaa7futy86npx8yqyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy08wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wshsqgrzxfre20v0sy7eqymtgtlcjpphhsfty42d7fszz407gy2ud8xtxy6mvds8 nostr:naddr1qvzqqqr4gupzp0rve5f6xtu56djkfkkg7ktr5rtfckpun95rgxaa7futy86npx8yqqs8qunfvdjj6ctn94sj6ur0wf6xvmmvd9hj6anpd36k2ttjv96xjmcm8rwdk
Money supply is always net increasing, but what the increasing supply gets spent on determines where increases in prices occur. Parking it in assets for long periods means it's not placed in demand for everyday things but causes an increase in asset prices. The "excess" inflation after plandemic money handouts was because it got circulated into buying actual things, versus the typical way money is handed out that gets parked in assets with the goal of sucking in more money in the form of rents and high interest, ie usury.
Economics is mostly alchemy and lies because the forcing function calculation ultimately being made is determining distance to the money spigot
Sounds about right.