from a UX perspective, clients should offer options for non-custodial payments (even if you use custodial lightning). My guess is it's just an early client and they haven't had the chance to let users specify an address.

The benefit of cashu address is that everyone has one now so new users don't have to set up any wallets (my earlier note about nostr-wide 100% zappability). But like you said, it IS experimental and probably shouldnt' be used for large purchases / sales.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I dont understand. Everyone already has a cashu address/wallet?

Yes! As far as I know …

I just sent you some nuts 🥜

I dont see it. Where do i look? I use amethyst.

Npub.cash (for now). If any devs took note of my note we might have it directly in client!

I'll look there and see if i can figure it out. Thank you.

Just sign in and it should be there

Cant sign in, tells me i dont have a nip-07 installed? I'll look at it again later.

Yep; we’re in early development and are working on adding more payment options and profile editing, as well as giving sellers preferences on how they wish to receive payments.

Although Cashu is experimental, it’s very reliable in terms of sending and receiving sats, arguably better than many non-custodial lightning solutions, and has facilitated lightning transactions up to 1M sats without trouble as far as I know.