Re decentralised, I think there needs to be an allowance for it to grow, room for mistakes and hopefully it matures up as an ecosystem. Just like how democracy has taken 2000 yrs and still fine tuning. There’s probably no one ideology or protocol that’s fits all but allowing it to happen is a start. On AI, on one hand I wonder how much it impacts long term thinking process on humans. On this other hand, just this morning my friends were sharing how a local startup implemented autonomous (hands free) driving on local cars, forked comma.AI on open source. But we are def at the early stages of machine consciousness.
Discussion
To be clear: I think decentralized protocols and a decentralized approach is critical to a positive future, given the risks of concentrated power over information. Don’t get me wrong. I just think the problem can’t be reduced to along a simplistic systemic axis like this. The risks are multivariate, and the potential for harm is theoretically unbounded.
There are externality risks associated with it — I can advertently or inadvertently bring you harm by effects that stem from the technology — whether or not you are party to any transaction or relationship with the creation or use thereof.