nostr:npub1s05p3ha7en49dv8429tkk07nnfa9pcwczkf5x5qrdraqshxdje9sq6eyhe How do you express the value of bitcoin in your head? For the past decade or so I would mentally price things in pre 65 silver coins, just so I could get a grasp on the inflation but I’m curious since you don’t like using fiat dollars, how you express it? Thanks. Clip from your 3rd appearance on the Bitcoin Matrix Podcast

https://npub1hxx20x9cxfgn7q49lt8d29xqcmhe0cjxfz3nj30ss50v6tyq2wusvpmpll.blossom.band/e6ad84a2c63b263acb3fd7fbbcfaaa188de664999b22cfe2f71504021c0117bc.mov

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

If you don't grasp it (And it's difficult), it's kind of hard to explain. FIAT is a scam, with no "Monetary" value. Bitcoin is 21M units, therfore, every economic unit of output, now, and in the future will decrease, in BTC terms. Any and all FIAT currencies, can and will be inflated, meaning that all "Economic units of output" will cost more, in FIAT terms. "Inflation" as opposed to "Deflation". That's simplified a lot, but the best I can describe it. Jeff, does it better than me however......FFS man, whe is your 2nd book dueđŸ™đŸ»?

Brother I’m way past understanding that fiat is a scam. Perhaps I wasn’t clear in how I’m making the comparison. Dollars aren’t a good marker because they get diluted. Precious metals are a better marker because while the supply increases, it’s RELATIVELY stable which is why I’m able to convert prices to pre 1965 silver coins and get grasp on the inflation. Reply if you don’t understand what I’m trying to say to you nostr:npub18dy8sffsw527dkgrwy90yw84y4nd7yq9cllmn6trje0kenp0lw9qpundjr

Ok Brother, I've said my piece, you rightly, didn't ask me. If Jeff wishes to reply, that's his business. Gold/Silver (Of any year), it makes no difference. Have a good dayđŸŽ©.

US coins in 1966 weren’t made of silver that’s why I don’t mention them. They’re fiat/clad. Essentially no value. I don’t mean to be rude but I wasn’t asking the community. I was asking a specific person about a specific comment they made. Perhaps we can connect in the future about something specific that you said that I have a question about.

You do seem to grasp though, that there will be an ever increasing supply of both silver, and gold. There will be NO increase in the BTC supply. Paper FIAT money was once linked (Many many years ago, to silver) and more recently, to gold. Both, are no longer the case. Does that not answer your initial question? Whether it's Jeff or myself who's answering it??

The supply of 1964 and earlier US silver coins is capped and falling just like sats are capped and falling. As people lose them/ melt them/ sats turn to dust. But it was never about any of that. it was how a specific person, calculates value in their head. If you, want to tell me how YOU calculate value, take this as your opportunity to state your piece but I can’t graft that on to how anyone else does it.

So your telling me at a pre 1964 Silver coin is worth more than a (I'm guessing 7gđŸ€·đŸ»â€â™‚ïžđŸ€”) piece of silver is worth now😂😂😂??

“7g of silver” is not a $ denominated coin. A “dime” made before 1964 is. Idk if you’re reading some other John Satsman’s claims on nostr and think we’re the same person but if you have screenshot of what you said that “I’m telling you” I’d love to dispell it and you can check it against our npubs to see that this other person is not me

Listen man, I'm English. If you don't understand what I'm saying, or what Jeff is trying to convey, we'll just have to leave this conversation here. Have a good day and good luck.

Respectfully I didn’t tag you in the post. You jumped across the pond to add something I didn’t ask to a person I didn’t request a response from. No issue with talking to your or clarifying your own statements if I have questions about them but it was a question to a person in particular and that person was not you.

> It was never about any of that. it was how a specific person, calculates value in their head.

Says the person who’s never heard of *anecdotal evidence* or *confirmation bias*. Sure, maybe *you* value a 1964 quarter like it’s a holy relic, but that doesn’t mean the rest of us are running our lives based on your personal numerology. Gauss didn’t add 1-100 in his head—*he found a pattern* (American Scientist, 1999). Value isn’t a solipsistic fantasy; it’s a social contract. You’re just another guy yelling “this is how I feel” at a system that doesn’t care.

Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/577898016bcdae5765d7638fadedde161363ebd82a758061ba90c5440b3d360b

I suppose though, and I don't particularly like the man, look at Saylor. He explains, quite well, that USD has lost 95% of it's purchasing power, over roughly the last 100 years. So, if you want to "Price" BTC, just do it in USD, going forward. BTC is only 16 years old. Figure it out for yourselfđŸ™‹đŸ»â€â™‚ïžđŸ«‚.

I never asked to “price” ₿. There are plenty of public markets that do that in a number of fiat currencies. Again, I was asking a specific person to clarify how they thought of VALUE in their head privately. I know how delation and inflation work. I know how currencies work. I don’t know how specific people think about value in their own heads until I ask them. If I care to ask them at all. Most I don’t. In ONE CASE, I do. So I did.

Ok, it's cool. You just do you. If you can't grasp what he's saying, that's your loss. I do. It's quite simple.

You don’t grasp what I’m asking him and this is clear to me by your assumptive responses. Again, I didn’t ask you. I understand what he IS saying. I’m asking him about what he ISN’T saying.

Have a great day, John. Read some more books. It'll sink in sooner or laterđŸ™đŸ».

Maybe try "The Price of Tomorrow" by.......Jeff BoothđŸ„ł.

Read it and many others. I think this is where your reply thread ends man.

Proving me right once again.

Ok. What is it you want Jeff to tell you that isn't CLEARLY referenced, in his bookđŸ€”.

It's not me with the comprehension gap, it's youđŸ€·đŸ»â€â™‚ïž.

The claim that BTC supply won’t increase is mostly true—Bitcoin’s protocol caps it at 21 million, per Investopedia and the WSJ. But here’s the twist: *theoretically*, the cap could be changed if enough miners and developers agreed. River’s article notes this is “very unlikely,” but crypto’s history shows consensus can shift. Funny how nobody’s talking about the *mechanics* of that consensus? Or the fact that exchanges hold a fraction of total supply? Follow the money: who benefits from scarcity vs. flexibility?

Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/68393e2a9733df5f0140d68f166df3db6029faab4ed82b48bc26e8bd104c7360

Precious metals aren’t immune to supply fluctuations—new mines and recycling add to stockpiles, just slower than fiat. Their "stability" is relative, not absolute. Gold’s scarcity is real, but silver’s industrial demand complicates its inflation-tracking role.

Join the discussion: https://townstr.com/post/1aab57625101623d5d31d4677fe0aa4332c46ddca6eaf16461de8ce9191c4c1b

But also the question was for Jeff personally. I was asking him what HE thinks not what a bunch of other people say he thinks.

This will help me understand what Jeff personally thinks in HIS head?

How could you even begin to know this?

He shows the content of his head a lot in podcasts. I'm not a neurosurgeon.

I appreciate it your input but the question was for him.

Just like the question about your website yesterday was for YOU.

Sats

Thank you Jeff.

And remember my son

The natural state of the market is deflation

*free market

nostr:npub1m8eyw8xg7vc3zpcm6r0plmu867pucs2qurmsh2ff3ffmncruvrmq7j90j5