Avatar
Sweary and bookish.
3b487825307515e6d903710af238f52566df1005c7ffb9e963965f6ccc2ffb8a
Nihilist.

Do not trust this man, with your secrets!

They also get tap, completely wrong. Faucet🤷🏻‍♂️.

Just made a dent in my pile of washing. Small wins to start '26, don't want to aim too high, too soon🙏🏻.

GM node🙋🏻‍♂️.

I have just been for a walk, in the woods, to listen to the birds🐦.

As I'd finished writing that note, i returned to my main feed, and there it was☹️😂.

Australia still leading the way, today. Will nostr:nprofile1qqsd9pqnwyshrse7z975h5ynptq9ktz3kv8txqs7lr20zgelqtys52cpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsz9nhwden5te0dehhxarjv4kxjar9wvhx7un89uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0yqwdjn save the day for America🤔.

Replying to Avatar Joe Bloggs

I didn't name Dirc within my work. However, I believe his brain sat within the 1%ers group of human actors. The Nephilim were closer to Zero than him, we all fell from complete structural alignment with the Universe, that was held by those referred to as God's from which the Nephilim were closest.

The key variable is the %age distance from Zero.

So, as I understand him, not strange, but more structurally aligned with the truth of the Universe and the Eternity beyond.

Dirac’s was a pure 1%er, but in a narrow band.

Paul sat firmly inside the 1%, but with critical characteristics of a single-axis 1%er.

Why Dirac fits within the 1%er group;-

near-zero tolerance for narrative;

extreme resistance to social inflation;

direct perception of structural necessity and

the ability to introduce new script elements e.g. antimatter, rather than interpret the existing ones.

He did not explain physics, he changed what physics was allowed to be. That is the defining feature of a 1%er.

Dirac’s Unique Subtype is the silent rewriter

within the 1%ers, Dirac belongs to a rare subtype I implicitly define but haven’t yet to full flesh-out and name.

Dirac-Type 1%er;-

Accesses script without commentary;

makes changes without justification and

leaves behind structures that must later be explained by others.

He did not;-

Teach well

Persuade

Evangelise and

Build communities.

He simply altered the base layer and stepped back.

This is why;-

Others had to interpret Dirac, as his papers were short, dense, and final. His influence exceeded his output volume of work.

Dirac was not an 11%er as they;-

See the structure

But must translate it and

Operate between Zero and society.

These would include;-

Bohr

Einstein in his later years

Philosophical physicists

Explainers and systematisers

Dirac could not translate.

Not because he lacked understanding, but because, translation introduces noise and

noise violates structural integrity.

An 11%er asks;-

How do I explain this?

Dirac spoke;-

This is not allowed to exist!

That distinction alone excludes him from the 11%ers group.

Why Dirac Was Not an 88%er, despite his awkwardness. It might be tempting to see Dirac as socially marginal and place him lower.

But 88%ers would;-

Operate inside the script

Optimise it

Reinforce it and

Keep it running.

Dirac broke the script repeatedly with his;-

Antimatter

Relativistic quantum mechanics and

Equation-first epistemology.

The 88%ers stabilise reality, whereas people like Dirac redefined their thoughts and grammar.

The Cost of Dirac’s 1% Alignment

My framework correctly implies that proximity to Zero has a human cost For Dirac, this cost was extreme in the form of;-

Human Function

Effect

Emotional expression

Severely reduced

Social bonding

Weak

Narrative comfort

Almost absent

Metaphor tolerance

Closer to Zero

Loneliness

Most thoughts unexpressed

This aligns perfectly with my model, "The closer to Zero, the less padding reality provides".

Dirac paid in human warmth for structural clarity.

Dirac vs other 1%ers an important distinction is

not all 1%ers look like Dirac.

Some are;-

charismatic;

destructive;

visionary storytellers and

are political and or spiritual figures.

Dirac represents the cleanest possible 1% alignment;-

No power-seeking;

No ego signalling and

No myth-building.

Just structural honesty which made him;-

Less visible;

Less relatable;

More dangerous to false frameworks and

More enduring in truth.

Where Paul Dirac sits inside my model framework;-

= 1%er

= Direct script access

= Zero-adjacent cognition

= Single-domain rewriter (physics)

= Minimal narrative output

= Maximum structural impact

He did not guide humanity.

He adjusted the universe’s source code and left.

As such;-

Some 1%ers shout.

Some burn.

Some lead.

Dirac simply removed the noise until the truth had no choice but to appear.

I covered the human actors and their structural alignment with the Universe in this article, just in case you haven't read it, all or want a refresher.

https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/a-new-hole-universe-5e3e99a6557a

Can't argue with anything you've postulated there. I bought the book, in the main, to read about his character as opposed to his physics. It is largely thought, now, that he was autistic, which wasn't even a clinical diagnosis till the late 1930's. If you read about Henry Cavendish, he too, was also thought to be autistic. As you say, they often work within a very narrow frame of reference, eschewing societal norms. I think this is an important aspect of "Discovery", in all it's forms, especially when looking to rewrite the nature of things. The closer to zero, the narrower the scope, the closer to "Truth".

Thanks Sandy, I knew he was a Rasta but never knew the Mt Zion connection🙏🏻. That's my 2026 off to a more knowledgeable start🥳.

Bizzarely, I was thinking about this song yesterday. As far as I know, Bob Marley wasn't Jewish🤔. What on earth was he singing about here🤷🏻‍♂️?

So, it wasn't even "Filmed" then🤔.

Well sheeeeeeiit, I was one of those people. Illusion, shattered☹️.

Having said that, the movie you reference, doesn't appear to have been completed. They might edit it down to like, 184mins or something🤷🏻‍♂️.

Wordle 1,658 4/6*

🟩⬛⬛⬛⬛

🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛

🟩🟩🟩⬛⬛

🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

#Wordle.

Another mildly annoying one, for me. I've posted it on Primal this time. I wonder if it'll stick around🤷🏻‍♂️.

GM Ryan. I was up chatting shit on here till 4AM🤷🏻‍♂️😂. 6hrs sleep and I'm now.......chatting shit on here again😬😂.

OK, we'll drop the air. The natural birth right, of a Briton, to flaunt is superiority AND have you decency, to allow a lowly American wench, the honour, of becoming his wife. How's that🤔?

Yes, that's a good point actually. My son wanted to join the military when he was younger. It took a lot of persuading and explaining to him that this would be folly. Depending on how soon the shit hits the fan over here in Europe, they may even try to conscript him, again, I'll be telling him to very very seriously consider becoming a conscientious objector, that's what I'd do. There's no fucking way I'd be fighting a way, thousands of miles away, for fuck all.

Strangely, that is the 2nd Monty Python reference I've made on here today😳😂.

Replying to Avatar Ch!llN0w1

Hey, it might be a new year but it's still how I feel🤷🏻‍♂️🥳.

Replying to Avatar Ch!llN0w1

*Sniggering AI voices🤷🏻‍♂️.