I didn't name Dirc within my work. However, I believe his brain sat within the 1%ers group of human actors. The Nephilim were closer to Zero than him, we all fell from complete structural alignment with the Universe, that was held by those referred to as God's from which the Nephilim were closest.
The key variable is the %age distance from Zero.
So, as I understand him, not strange, but more structurally aligned with the truth of the Universe and the Eternity beyond.
Diracās was a pure 1%er, but in a narrow band.
Paul sat firmly inside the 1%, but with critical characteristics of a single-axis 1%er.
Why Dirac fits within the 1%er group;-
near-zero tolerance for narrative;
extreme resistance to social inflation;
direct perception of structural necessity and
the ability to introduce new script elements e.g. antimatter, rather than interpret the existing ones.
He did not explain physics, he changed what physics was allowed to be. That is the defining feature of a 1%er.
Diracās Unique Subtype is the silent rewriter
within the 1%ers, Dirac belongs to a rare subtype I implicitly define but havenāt yet to full flesh-out and name.
Dirac-Type 1%er;-
Accesses script without commentary;
makes changes without justification and
leaves behind structures that must later be explained by others.
He did not;-
Teach well
Persuade
Evangelise and
Build communities.
He simply altered the base layer and stepped back.
This is why;-
Others had to interpret Dirac, as his papers were short, dense, and final. His influence exceeded his output volume of work.
Dirac was not an 11%er as they;-
See the structure
But must translate it and
Operate between Zero and society.
These would include;-
Bohr
Einstein in his later years
Philosophical physicists
Explainers and systematisers
Dirac could not translate.
Not because he lacked understanding, but because, translation introduces noise and
noise violates structural integrity.
An 11%er asks;-
How do I explain this?
Dirac spoke;-
This is not allowed to exist!
That distinction alone excludes him from the 11%ers group.
Why Dirac Was Not an 88%er, despite his awkwardness. It might be tempting to see Dirac as socially marginal and place him lower.
But 88%ers would;-
Operate inside the script
Optimise it
Reinforce it and
Keep it running.
Dirac broke the script repeatedly with his;-
Antimatter
Relativistic quantum mechanics and
Equation-first epistemology.
The 88%ers stabilise reality, whereas people like Dirac redefined their thoughts and grammar.
The Cost of Diracās 1% Alignment
My framework correctly implies that proximity to Zero has a human cost For Dirac, this cost was extreme in the form of;-
Human Function
Effect
Emotional expression
Severely reduced
Social bonding
Weak
Narrative comfort
Almost absent
Metaphor tolerance
Closer to Zero
Loneliness
Most thoughts unexpressed
This aligns perfectly with my model, "The closer to Zero, the less padding reality provides".
Dirac paid in human warmth for structural clarity.
Dirac vs other 1%ers an important distinction is
not all 1%ers look like Dirac.
Some are;-
charismatic;
destructive;
visionary storytellers and
are political and or spiritual figures.
Dirac represents the cleanest possible 1% alignment;-
No power-seeking;
No ego signalling and
No myth-building.
Just structural honesty which made him;-
Less visible;
Less relatable;
More dangerous to false frameworks and
More enduring in truth.
Where Paul Dirac sits inside my model framework;-
= 1%er
= Direct script access
= Zero-adjacent cognition
= Single-domain rewriter (physics)
= Minimal narrative output
= Maximum structural impact
He did not guide humanity.
He adjusted the universeās source code and left.
As such;-
Some 1%ers shout.
Some burn.
Some lead.
Dirac simply removed the noise until the truth had no choice but to appear.
I covered the human actors and their structural alignment with the Universe in this article, just in case you haven't read it, all or want a refresher.
https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/a-new-hole-universe-5e3e99a6557a
