#[0]​

I’d like to re-post the note that you have not responded here as an attachment.

I understand that if you switched to English, you would not have addressed the same issue in the same way, because it is obvious that history research cannot replace that of politics, that said, historians are lay persons just like high school graduates in front of political science. Therefore, while we communicate in Chinese, I believe you need to be really cautious not to just leverage the popular saying in Chinese as your argument, because most of the arguments available in this language are there to mislead people, and thus do harm to the nation as a whole.

I. would rather that you translate from English source and provide your responses to these questions. Because it is really obvious that historians are lay persons in the research field of political science, vice versa is also true. Therefore, as I have said, a historian studies history, but a political scientist studies political science as well as politics. This is a common sense, not something that bears ambiguity so it should be just out of the question. Thank you.

nostr:note1783a0fxfpe40cg77q854t5qnsevez5lve7lfrqz63kqg7wn3ty3q7jqlslT