在六四大屠杀北京时间三十六周年纪念日的那一天，我行走了十三公里，回顾了个人历程，也为下阶段希望从事的事业进行了规划。我并未停止……
sulili.net
在六四大屠杀北京时间三十六周年纪念日的那一天，我行走了十三公里，回顾了个人历程，也为下阶段希望从事的事业进行了规划。我并未停止……
suilli.net
问了AI 一个问题：如果有恐怖组织入侵美国，攻击屠杀和绑架人质共数千人，美国会不会停止对该组织的军事行动直到所有人质回家?
AI: 不，美国绝不可能停止全面军事行动。911导致3000人丧生，美国进行了20年的军事行动。西方对以色列的双标显示它们对以主权合法性无完全认可。
AI分析：电报不会向中国政府提交任何信息
社交网络平台电报不会向中国政府提供中国用户或任何其他国家用户的信息 虽然电报披露将依据政府法庭判决，向相关政府部门提交恐怖分子嫌疑人对用户信息，这是指其服务器和运作所在国，且具有许多限制。电报至今尚未提交任何信息给任何第三方，包括政府。而对于中国政府而言，电报在中国没有服务器，也被中国禁止，因此，电报不会向中国提交任何信息，无论以什么名义，如该用户使用的是中国电话号码等。下面是AI的分析：
實際情況是：
小個體戶或微型企業受到當地的盤剝但這些根本上不了新聞而非不打擊甚至支持。舉例，過去城管對擺攤的個體戶進行強制沒收、毆打、甚至抓捕，菜市場的小販必須交重額稅費，這才有了隨街擺攤，但會遭城管毆打拘留，以前夏俊峰被判死刑，起因就是殺了城管自衛。小型餐飲，光點火開鑿就得幾萬甚至幾十萬。開小廠，不給上萬就不讓消防過檢⋯⋯
哪一樣不是打擊？但這不是中央集權政府屑於干預的。中央政府只干預做大了的民企。
外資是因為行政起點就在市一級，當地以及中共為賺取外匯而不去過度干預，另一方面，他們聲音大，動輒受國際媒體關注，但即便如此，其核心業務，出口，也遭盤剝。海關以各種理由導致報關不過，就得花錢，以前一個貨櫃得上千的賄賂。
教授們只會坐在沙發上點評，根本不知道實際發生了什麼事。 nostr:note16z94krxx68spypt7dfanm4aqfyzzav6s7pl755zz4jhd248vvrlqvtusm0
Mar 1, 2025: Marxism in China Vs. in the West (by ChatGPT)
Over decades of observing and participating in efforts for political change, I have come to recognize significant challenges that continue to hinder movements, particularly in maintaining clarity of values, building public trust, and addressing intergenerational gaps.
在几十年的观察和参与政治变革的努力中，我逐渐认识到一些持续阻碍运动发展的重大挑战，特别是在保持价值观清晰性、建立公众信任以及弥合代际差距方面。我想分享我的观点，这些观点既来源于我的学生时代的活动经历，也来源于我作为独立思想者的反思....
在2024年11月26日发表关于民主自由人权等三篇文章而以后网站遭 #禁言 。直到2024年12月15日，再次发邮件给支持团队后，编辑解禁，但是谷歌分析仍 #被禁 ，意味着本网无法被搜索到。今天发出了关于 #谷歌分析 被禁的邮件: http://sulili.net
#Editor #GoogleAnalytics #Banned 4 #Speech
中文圈大量使用「轉型正義」用以形容中國未來的政治變革過程，這個術語本身的正常含義並不是中國人所指的「政治轉型」而是一種民間的創傷恢復過程。
On Walmart’s rollback of DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusivity)
This is a significant sign of the deepened social division rather than cohesion. Why is that?
评沃尔玛取消DEI（多元平等包容）政策
这是与ChatGPT对话的一部分，我将其英文与中文翻译并行放在页面上，供讨论。
sulili.net/dei
异议圈中的主流价值
ChatGPT分析中国异议人士对美国政治的态度
ChatGPT analyzes Chinese diaspora dissidents’ political stance toward American politics (with English original texts)
On my timeline, I can only see my own notes. Are there any issues with Nostr platform? Why can’t I see anyone’s note from my following list?
English original:
You are absolutely right in identifying individual independence and autonomy as the foundational requirement for meaningful democratization in politically traditional societies like China. Your argument highlights the systemic changes needed before democracy can genuinely take root. Let’s break down your reasoning and its broader implications:
1. Autonomy as the Foundation of Democracy
• True Autonomy: For democracy to function effectively, individuals must be free from undue influence, whether from family, clans, or powerful figures. They must be capable of making informed, independent decisions about governance.
• Dependency Undermines Democracy: In societies where individuals rely on familial or hierarchical networks for survival:
• Their votes are often dictated by obligations or coercion, not personal convictions.
• Power brokers, rather than democratic principles, shape outcomes, rendering elections meaningless.
Key Insight:
• Without autonomy, elections are not a tool for democracy but a reflection of existing power dynamics, where those who control resources wield disproportionate influence.
2. The Role of a Nationwide Safety Net
• Breaking Familial Dependency:
• In traditional societies, family networks fill the gap left by the absence of public welfare systems. While this may ensure survival, it creates hierarchical dependencies that undermine individual freedom.
• For example:
• Elderly care often depends on filial piety, pressuring younger generations to prioritize family obligations over personal goals.
• Unemployment or illness forces individuals to rely on extended family, reducing their capacity to act independently in political or social matters.
• Public Systems as Liberators:
• A nationwide safety network (e.g., healthcare, pensions, unemployment benefits) ensures that no one is forced to rely on private networks for basic needs.
• These systems empower individuals to act as autonomous citizens, capable of participating in democracy on their own terms.
Examples of Safety Net Success:
1. Western Democracies:
• Robust welfare systems in countries like Sweden or Germany enable individuals to make independent decisions, free from familial or economic coercion.
2. Emerging Democracies:
• In countries like South Korea, the development of public welfare systems during democratization reduced reliance on family and traditional hierarchies, fostering individual autonomy.
3. The Dangers of Premature Elections
You correctly argue that elections in a society without autonomy will not produce genuine democracy:
• Influence and Power Dynamics:
• In the absence of autonomy, elections become tools for those with the most influence—whether family patriarchs, local elites, or state authorities.
• The results reflect power hierarchies rather than the will of the people.
• Elections as a Façade:
• Premature elections in authoritarian or traditional societies often lead to pseudo-democracy, where voting exists in form but not in substance.
• Examples:
• In some regions, clan leaders or religious authorities dictate voting patterns, nullifying individual choice.
• Authoritarian regimes like China or Russia might introduce controlled elections to simulate democracy while maintaining tight control over outcomes.
4. Steps Toward Genuine Democratization
To build a foundation for democracy in a society like China, the following steps are essential:
A. Establish a Public Welfare System
1. Universal Healthcare and Education:
• Ensures that all individuals have access to basic services, reducing dependency on family or local networks.
2. Pensions and Unemployment Benefits:
• Empowers individuals to pursue personal goals without fear of destitution, breaking the cycle of familial or hierarchical dependency.
B. Promote Economic Equality
1. Reduce Wealth Gaps:
• Extreme inequality undermines democracy by concentrating power in the hands of a few.
2. Invest in Rural and Urban Areas:
• A nationwide safety net must address disparities between rural and urban regions to ensure equal participation.
C. Build Civic Institutions
1. Independent Judiciary:
• Guarantees the rule of law and protects individual rights.
2. Freedom of Expression:
• Encourages informed political discourse and prevents coercion or manipulation.
D. Cultural Shift Toward Individual Autonomy
1. Challenge Traditional Norms:
• Promote values that prioritize individual dignity and choice over rigid family or societal obligations.
2. Civic Education:
• Teach citizens about their rights and responsibilities in a democratic society.
5. The Path to Meaningful Elections
Once these foundational changes are in place, elections can serve their intended purpose:
• Reflecting the People’s Will:
• Autonomous individuals, free from coercion, can vote based on their beliefs and interests.
• Accountability:
• Elections enable citizens to hold leaders accountable, fostering transparency and good governance.
6. The Example of China
China’s traditional reliance on familial networks and centralized control poses unique challenges:
• Current Dependency:
• The absence of a nationwide welfare system means citizens must rely on family, local networks, or the state for survival, limiting their autonomy.
• Potential Reforms:
• If China were to invest in a robust safety net, it could reduce dependency and foster conditions for meaningful democratization.
• Risks of Premature Elections:
• Without systemic reform, introducing elections risks creating a system dominated by existing power structures, where outcomes are dictated by elites rather than citizens.
7. Conclusion: Autonomy First, Democracy Second
Your argument highlights a crucial principle: democracy cannot thrive without individual autonomy, and autonomy depends on a robust public welfare system. For traditional societies like China, the path to democratization requires:
1. Building Infrastructure: Public systems that reduce dependency on family and local hierarchies.
2. Empowering Individuals: Economic and social reforms that enable autonomy.
3. Gradual Change: Focusing on structural reforms before introducing elections.
By prioritizing these steps, a society can lay the groundwork for genuine democracy, ensuring that elections reflect the true will of autonomous, independent citizens.
Damus seems to have stopped functioning! Is it a problem with everyone? Or is it just my individual problem?
本文基于ChatGPT对我的个人评论的总结，我提到社会要走向文明并不依赖经济发展状况，而是依赖基础公共事业的建设，但这不是指中国所说的“土木基建”，而是指社会安全网，如全民教育、医疗、养老等覆盖所有人的制度……
民主党的败选结果造成了很多不安，所以，在讨论时自然也会联想到政治选举的结果。下面是与ChatGPT对话中的一段，分析败选的原因之一，标题：哈里斯为什么会输？
中英文均为AI生成。
有一段话是ChatGPT的，虽然并不能完全引起我的共鸣，但我还是在大体上肯定其论述。我非常希望能翻译成中文，分享给中文异见人士，但是，ChatGPT认为无法完全翻译为中文，仅提供了一个压缩版。
https://www.sulili.net/20013222692432235265327731998235199260413953220811246052002720041.html