Marxists didnt just “undermine” these things.

They were violent vigilante terrorists in the 60s and 70s at least (with more communist guerillas in even the 20s than people give credit for) and were GIVEN those positions as a concession to stop movements like the weather underground.

Force is ABSOLUTE. Sure, it won’t replace reality or make the impossible possible…

But it ends the argument EVERY time.

As the Charlie Kirk assassination showed, you can be right about so much and it STILL doesn’t matter in the face of well placed force.

The counter to an evil government is a well armed citizenry.

The counter to institutionalized collectivists who are still threatening you with force, but with semantic lies via “plausible deniability” is a force willing to engage in violence to call the bluff of the threat they are levying against you.

Eg: “we know what your implication is when you call someone a ‘Nazi’ for not wanting to pay taxes. It is a dogwhistle for heretics to target for abuse. We are not stupid. Try it and it will be your grave.”

Too much of right wing and libertarian discourse is “bigger man syndrome”.

“We just have to win them over.” “We just have to make our own schools.”

Then they send antifa/BLM mobs to smash your schools, beat you to a pulp, and then Kyle Rittenhouse you when you refuse to let you kill them.

The left bombed courthouses.

Freedom lovers can, for example, at bare minimum, physically detain judges trying to punish people for peaceful mere possession of a firearm.

How about a citizens arrest for the blatant malicious prosecution of Rittenhouse and Daniel penny?

Etc.

Anything BUT meeting force with force is playing to lose.