I say copyright is a violation of property rights.
From the inception of these rules, right at the beginning of the second millennium AD, the king asserted that even if you fed and raised the cow that was owned by someone else, the baby cow remained the property of the owner of the mother. From this analogy, it was claimed that a 3 months long process of copying a text from an early copy of the Vulgate was still the property of the man who owned it and lent it to the copier.
As @β‘οΈπ±π points out, there is scope for the plaintiffs to appeal to this notion of the product of copyright material remaining with the one who claims the copyright.
It's the ultimate aim of copyright anyway, to exclude people from accessing information.
> βGovernments don't want a population capable of critical thinking, they want obedient workers, people just smart enough to run the machines and just dumb enough to passively accept their situation.β
>
> β George Carlin
Fun fact, Carlin was just paraphrasing ... now, I can't remember who it was. A Rothschild? Rockefeller?
This is also a key goal of the Prussian invented system of indoctrination, dressed up as education. It's not the government, per se, it's the people who secretly control the government in every way they can get away with, and that's also why governments are evil, they are nothing more than a puppet mechanism for an ongoing effort to enslave the mass of humanity.