. . . . Huh?
Discussion
I just don't trust either of them. I get why you're supportive of it. I do. It's great marketing for the bitcoin community. But, I won't trust these two until I see bitcoin made as legal tender in the U.S. along with substantial acceptance from the public for use as a payment method. They're also politicians, man!🙄there's no reason to believe that these two will keep their word in the long run.
Agree to disagree.
I don't have TDS.
I'm just not allergic to the truth. And yes, I can see quite clearly where the truth tends to align. Everyone can, or should.
You think to small of Bitcoin. Think Bigger.
Agree to disagree. That's fine by me, man.
I definitely don't think small of Bitcoin. It's the reason why I no longer have a bank account. Of course, i realize its potential🙄. I also understand how making bitcoin legal tender in a developed (and EXTREMELY powerful) country like the US will impact global adoption. It'll kick it into hyperdrive, imo.
This isn't just about Bitcoin, though. I'm more worried about the geopolitical consequences of this meeting. What's to stop them from starting a new conflict funded by bitcoin? Nothing. There's nothing stopping them from doing so.
Idk. I'm just throwing around ideas. But, we've seen too many times throughout history where people like Bukele and Trump are first praised as heroes then, over time, turn into the same sadistic tyrants that they ousted. So... 🤷
But eliminating the apparatus that makes their respective positions ripe for corruption and completely insulated?
Doesn't make much sense to me.
What if El Salvador decides, at some point, that they want to expand their territory? Well they'll, most likely, be able to if they're granted access to the US Bitcoin reserves. Bitcoin is not good money, it's NEUTRAL.
Careful, bud. Sounds to me like you caught a little TDS.