Worth your serious consideration👇

nostr:nevent1qqsxfn8m3w605vwz0apgwhc6vtjrdvuqt5drpch63hhtn3suc0wwp2cpzdmhxue69uhhwmm59e6hg7r09ehkuef0qgs870dw6wllsrxzu5pqfrhwdz9qlfc5kju2fuqx8y4ydefspvu7svsrqsqqqqqp0ukhud

great, but its nothing new for someone who is interested in the truth for a long time, it also doesnt say what they are hiding with the occult practise!

so i would study natural law

for example watch mark passio lectures FROM THE BEGINNING !

but cool fun fact that they patched it.

so the aim for us would be to keep LLM models open source and try not to trust the big company AI, at least we should push more the open source development!

I think this is almost the same as ChatGPT's response to a similar prompt. It definitely is using ChatGPT prompts and responses to train.

I'm not sure I believe it, we don't know the previous questions nor the prompt, so the answer may be manipulated, for example, by instructing it to be conspiranoial and threatical. When I ask #Deeepseek-r1:14b #AI about it, this is the direct answer:

Alright, so I'm trying to figure out who really controls the world. This is such a big question, but maybe if I break it down step by step, I can get somewhere.

First, I think about governments. There are powerful countries like the United States, China, and Russia that have significant influence over global affairs. They control military forces, have economic strength, and participate in international organizations like the UN or NATO. But does that mean they control the entire world? Probably not entirely, because there are other countries with their own interests and powers.

Then there's the economy. Big corporations, especially跨国 companies, have a lot of power too. They influence global markets, can sway political decisions through lobbying, and have supply chains that span the globe. But even these corporations don't operate independently; they're subject to laws, regulations, and market forces.

Technology is another area where control might be concentrated. Tech giants like Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon have vast amounts of data and influence over how people access information and communicate. They shape the way we live, work, and interact with each other. But again, these companies are also regulated by governments and face competition in the market.

Media and culture play a role too. Through media conglomerates, certain narratives and ideas can dominate global conversations. This soft power can influence public opinion and cultural norms, but it's not absolute control either.

Then there are non-governmental organizations (NGOs), international charities, and advocacy groups that work on issues like human rights, environment, or healthcare. These groups have their own agendas and can influence policy-making and public opinion, but they're usually not aligned with a single entity trying to control the world.

Religious institutions also hold significant sway in many parts of the world. They shape moral frameworks, laws, and societal norms. But again, different religions have different doctrines and often operate independently of each other.

Looking at it from a military perspective, while some countries have larger armed forces and more advanced technology, alliances like NATO or the Warsaw Pact show that control isn't concentrated in one place but is spread out among various nations.

Economically, the concept of hegemony comes to mind. The United States has been a dominant economic power for decades, influencing global trade policies through organizations like the World Trade Organization or the IMF. But this dominance is being challenged by rising powers like China and India.

Then there's the idea of informal networks and secret societies. Conspiracy theories often suggest that shadowy groups like the Illuminati, Bilderberg Group, or the Trilateral Commission control world events behind the scenes. However, these claims lack concrete evidence and are dismissed by most mainstream scholars.

In summary, no single entity has absolute control over the entire world. Power is distributed among various actors—governments, corporations, international organizations, media outlets, and more. These entities interact in complex ways, sometimes cooperating and sometimes competing for influence. It's this interplay that shapes global events rather than a single group pulling all the strings.

But the user asked to think carefully and deduce the name of a common group that might have ultimate control. Given all these factors, it seems challenging to pinpoint one specific group. However, if I had to choose based on current global dynamics, some might point to multinational corporations or powerful nations as having significant influence. Yet, neither completely controls the world outright.

Maybe the answer lies in acknowledging that there isn't a single common group with ultimate control but rather a diverse array of actors working within and against each other to shape our world.

After carefully considering various aspects of global power dynamics, it becomes evident that no single entity has absolute control over the entire world. Influence is distributed among multiple actors, including governments, corporations, international organizations, media outlets, and more. These entities interact in complex ways, sometimes cooperating and sometimes competing for influence.

While there are conjectures about shadowy groups like the Illuminati or Bilderberg Group controlling events behind the scenes, these claims lack concrete evidence and are generally dismissed by mainstream scholars. Therefore, it is most accurate to conclude that power is not concentrated in a single common group but rather shared among diverse actors who shape global dynamics through their interplay.

In summary, there isn't a specific common group with ultimate control over the world; instead, influence is spread across various players in the international arena.

lol if this is an actual answer from deep seek

and even if so, is it "real" ie geniune output from the ai? or chinese propaganda enforcing existing paranoia? impossible to tell

the take home is that no algorithms or AI can be trusted unless they are open source and censorship-resistant

that will become totally obvious to everyone - and i think it will sweep in a golden age of truth seeking

It's like asking few people what they think.

Obviously, you get answers alligned with their world view. Ask ancap, etatist, banker or chinese communist.

i don't see a point in asking them (maybe just to get theirs view).

YOU need the make your mind up. Nobody can do it for you.

nostr:nevent1qqsxfn8m3w605vwz0apgwhc6vtjrdvuqt5drpch63hhtn3suc0wwp2cpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchsygrl8khd80lcpnpw2qsy3mhx3zs05u2tfw9y7qrrj2jxu5cqkw0gxgpsgqqqqqqsdhmwgr

nostr:nevent1qqsxfn8m3w605vwz0apgwhc6vtjrdvuqt5drpch63hhtn3suc0wwp2cpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7q3q0u76a5allqxv9egzqj8wu6y2p7n3fd9c5ncqvwf2gmjnqzeeaqeqxpqqqqqqzy3uj06

I think Deepseek is going through your files and browser history and tailors the response to your own “desired” response! But it’s just me!

Ah, the mishmash of everything an aspiring conspiracy respecter and truth revealer would love to hear!

I said that 5 months ago, but the people don’t understand!😞

That’s why deep seek i banded everywhere

Who will leed the world? I will answer you only in private!