"There is no solution only tradeoffs"

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpl4psmp2geudh3phwp8w6gtqs3hg57q7t7chq4hfhvenssx4hhhjqyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcprdmhxue69uhhg6r9vehhyetnwshxummnw3erztnrdakj7qpq6tspy8wsuuca2mpfva4p7z4p6d572322rsgdkdepqdlhpw8jedespc86wk

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I disagree. If you carefully design the protocol to be a web-of-trust then you can not miss stuff and not get spam. But it has to be fundamental to the architecture, not tacked on later.

The "trade-off" is no global view or state. But that is fundamentally impossible at some scale anyway so not really a trade-off.

#NDN

Okay explain yourself please. Please don't sell me on the marketing fluff, any whitepapers I can take a look at?