Subnostr

I don't keep bringing it up, it is something that proponents of your model talk about. Yet you want to hand wave away what they say by calling them morons, because it doesn't line up with your beliefs.

The results of a faucault pendulum are too inconsistent to be any sort of reliable proof, otherwise it would solely be used as definitive exclusive proof. It conveniently ignores inconsistencies with procession and the effects of magnetism. It's not a proof of anything, and if that's the best you can offer, then it's pretty damn weak.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

inventor 2y ago

I called Brian Cox a moron, nobody else.

The results of Foucault Pendulums around the world are consistent with all the calculations made on the very well known rotation of the Earth.

"...Otherwise it would solely be used as definitive exclusive proof". It is used as definitive proof.

The experiment, well done, does not ignore precession or magnetism

If it is "pretty damn weak" then disprove it. Do the experiment and confirm that the planet does not rotate as expected. Do it. You can do it, anyone can do it, unless you live in the Equator. What are you afraid of? Do it.