If you keep applying Occam's razor you'll probably find that whatever phenomena you're attributing to disembodied beings is better explained by something material.

You're begging the question

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That would suggest that I am relying solely on Occam's razor in order to draw the conclusion, but of course there is far more than that to support the former idea. I was simply using Occam's razor as a means to have people start to think about the silly ideas placed inside their heads.

You can't explain it by something material, or if you can, I would love to hear it. We only perceive a fraction of what exists because our temporary bodies have a limited number of senses that can interpret and interact with this reality.

It's all about drawing logical conclusions based on multiple sets of evidences and observations.

Spake is fake, light doesn't travel, the big bang is ridiculous, no one could explain how the "aliens" would get here within the current understanding of 'science' without violating some fundamental laws. Modern astrophysicists rely on mathematical models to fill in the gaps of their shoddy science, like virtual photons.

There is zero evidence of anything resembling intelligent life that doesn't reside on Earth. If anything, the burden of proof lies on those proposing this (misleading) hypothesis in the first place.

Light doesn't travel?

Once you understand that the aether exists, then yes, the 'speed of light' is merely the rate of induction of this medium. That is why this perceived speed will vary depending on the medium it is 'moving' through.

As Tesla said, light is a sound wave in the aether, or an aether perturbation (disturbance) modality. It is the excitation of the medium where magnetism and dielectricity intersect.

What if I don't understand that the aether exists? Then what happens to light?

When is the speed of light perceived as varying?

The speed of light in a medium is inversely proportional to the refractive index of the medium, and it varies depending on the medium we perceive it to be moving through.

There are only two models that exist - the aetheric model and the atomist model. Atomists cannot define half the stuff they 'believe', and they rely on mathematical models to plug the holes in their dead-end theory. Feynman couldn't even explain magnetism, just like physicists today can't define what virtual photons or fields are.