I should have been more clear in my post. *Bret's take on evolution is what I find absurd. I am about half way, and really am only interested in the evolutionary dialogue.
Nothing Bret said is verifiable and, in fact, he doesn't bring any "scientific evidence" to his argument of evolution but instead gives examples of "how he sees it".
If you applied those same standards to tuckers creation arguments, you'd come to the same conclusion
Please Login to reply.
No replies yet.
