Avatar
Lew☦️
3881beaeead2cce4df1e7f527e9ade0a5721e4a6f612ff9ac82aa6c92b014a17
-It is later than you think! Hasten, therefore, to do the work of God. ☦️Fr. Seraphim Rose

"Why did the Protestant Reformers abandon the Greek Septuagint for a rabbinic textual tradition?"

I regret buying corn through KYC rails 😔

Friendly reminder: 12 days of Christmas starts now. Next stop, Theophany!

Merry Christmas brother!

He is a wonderful man, his book on the Orthodox Veneration of The Mother of God is outstanding. Really a great polemic for converts/Protestant friends who have a hard time with our deep love of the Theotokos.

From the perspective of the Theotokos, the Nativity shines as the mystery in which she offers her full and fearless obedience to God, not as a rival to Christ but as the one who freely receives Him in her flesh and becomes the living gateway of our salvation. In her womb, the Creator fashions for Himself a human nature taken wholly from her, and she bears Him in love while confessing, with deep humility, that the child she nurses is the One through whom all things came to be. Saint Gregory Palamas speaks of her as the boundary between the created and the uncreated, because in her person the human will responds without reserve to divine grace and makes possible the coming of the Word in the flesh (Gregory Palamas, Homily on the Entry of the Theotokos). Her motherhood never diminishes Christ but proclaims His full divinity and full humanity, since He receives from her what He does not possess eternally — our mortal life — while bestowing upon her, and through her upon us, the pledge of glorification. In the Feast of the Nativity, the Church honours her not as the source of salvation, but as the one who consents to become its vessel, and whose joyful assent echoes in every heart that dares to say yes to God.

Christ is born!

Glorify Him!

The grotto of the Nativity, Bethlehem, birthplace of our Lord

After many types and prefigurings, messengers and heralds, prophets and righteous men, wise men and kings, finally He appeared, the Lord of the world and King of kings, to perform the work of the salvation of mankind that could not be performed by His servants. May His be eternal glory and praise! Amen.

Today the Virgin gives birth to the Transcendent One,

And the earth offers a cave to the Unapproachable One!

Angels with shepherds glorify Him!

The wise men journey with a star!

Since for our sake the Eternal God was born as a Little Child!

Kontakion for the Nativity of our Lord and God and Saviour Jesus Christ

The Jews are preparing to celebrate “Nittel Nacht,” a parody of Christmas, where they mock the “hanged” with “latrines,” while reading “Toledot Yeshu,” a medieval story mocking the the Gospel which describes the life of Jesus, from birth to death, and is filled with blasphemous insults. Modern Judaism is not an "alternative continuation of the Second Temple religion, which evolved differently from Christianity,” but a false religion primarily built on rejection and opposition to Christ and Orthodox Christianity.

"Is there not a great gulf between us and the Jews? Is it not for the most important of matters that this dispute exists? Why do you mix what cannot be mixed? They crucified Christ, whom you worship."

☦️Saint John Chrysostomos

What a wonderful time of year! Without the incarnation of the God-Man Jesus Christ we would not have His Theophany, Transfiguration, Passion, Resurrection, and Ascension!

“What was prefigured at that time in the flame of the bush was openly manifested in the mystery of the Virgin… Just as on the mountain the bush burned but was not consumed, so also the Virgin gave birth to the light and was not corrupted.” —St. Gregory of Nyssa in The Life of Moses and On the Birth of Christ☦️

So difficult to choose but St Paisios is on my list too 🤝 as well as St. John Maximovitch.

From Anthony of Westgate*

God entered His creation here 🫂

Replying to Avatar Ava

This has nothing to do with Gnosticism versus the faith tradition created many years later in the name of Jesus... though, they didn't even get that right. His name wasn't Jesus.

The name Jesus came from a series of translations and transliterations. He was known in Aramaic, his mother tongue, as Yeshua Bar Yosef (Yeshua, son of Joseph).

We haven't even begun to talk about Gnosticism.

Anyone who has studied mythology and symbology for any length of time will immediately recognize the motifs running throughout the Bible. These patterns show up across cultures and spiritual traditions, centuries before Christianity existed.

You're quoting John 8 to interpret Genesis. I'm reading Genesis as it stands.

Genesis 3:22: God confirms the serpent told the truth. "Behold, the man has become like one of us, knowing good and evil."

You can interpret that through later theology created by the founders of Christianity and the religion they created ABOUT Yeshua, or you can read what the creation myth of Genesis actually says.

The Genesis narrative has multiple source traditions woven together. Scholars identify at least two distinct authorial hands in the text, though some argue for four separate sources commonly known as J (Yahwist), E (Elohist), D (Deuteronomist), and P (Priestly).

The tale is rich with ancient symbology that predates later theological interpretations, similar to how the story of Noah and the great flood is not unique to Judaism or Christianity. That story has been used throughout multiple spiritual traditions to symbolize the washing away of the old and the ushering in of the new.

The gospels attributed to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were written 40 to 70 years after Yeshua by anonymous communities, not by the disciples themselves. This is standard teaching in seminaries.

The names were added in the second century by church tradition, which is often done in religions to manufacture scriptural authority. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John did not write Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.

Reading a book rich with symbology, mythology, and parable as literal fact is to miss the mark. And that book, those teachings of Yeshua, are about you.

Hamartia (ἁμαρτία) is a Greek archery term that translates to missing the mark, which has been translated into the English word sin. Think about that.

To combine the Tanakh (Old Testament) and what has become called the New Testament in the same book is also to miss the mark.

The Tanakh speaks of the Judeo Father God who gets angry, becomes wrathful and vengeful, who teaches an eye for an eye.

The teachings of Yeshua were much more radical for the time. He taught to love one's neighbor as oneself, to help the needy, the concept of agape love, and that an eye for an eye leaves everyone blind.

These teachings are much more in alignment with the Buddha, who lived 500 years before the birth of Yeshua.

These two books do not come from the same religion. When Yeshua referenced the Tanakh, he did so as any Jewish teacher would, citing scripture while teaching his radically different message of self-realization and enlightenment.

Yeshua himself never wrote anything. He wasn't a Christian. He knew nothing of the religion that would be created in his name in the years and decades after his death.

He was a Jewish mystic teaching direct experience of the divine, showing others they too could realize their unity with God.

Yeshua explicitly taught this.

Luke 17:20-21: The kingdom of God does not come with observation, nor will they say see here or see there. For indeed, the kingdom of God is within you.

John 14:12: Very truly I tell you, whoever believes in me will do the works I have been doing, and they will do even greater things than these.

Psalm 82:6, which Yeshua quotes in John 10:34: I said, you are gods. You are all sons of the Most High.

1 Corinthians 3:16: Don't you know that you yourselves are God's temple and that God's Spirit dwells in your midst?

But the religion created later flipped his message. Yes, he taught you how to awaken. Yes, he said the kingdom is within you and you're capable of what he did, and greater.

But the institution said forget all that. You're a sinner. He's special. You're not. Just believe in him, accept the sacrifice, and he'll handle everything. No inner work required.

You are God's beautiful creation... tainted at birth by original sin. You'll never be what Yeshua taught that you already are, but do your best. Show up. Tithe. Let the institution mediate your relationship with God.

Yeshua spoke Aramaic, not Greek. The gospels were written in Greek decades after his death by people who never met him.

Most English Bibles translate from those Greek texts, which means the words attributed to Yeshua have already passed through one language barrier.

The Peshitta preserves an Aramaic tradition closer to the language Yeshua actually spoke, but the version most English speakers read has been filtered through Greek theological concepts that didn't exist in his Jewish mystical context.

Just like the Buddha 500 years before, they turned a teacher of self-realization and enlightenment into an object of worship; declared that his attainment was beyond your grasp, and called anyone who actually followed his teaching a heretic.

Why should a person trust what you or I have to say? Why should a person trust the texts or the authors who wrote them?

Christianity is not a religion based on a book or a collection of them. It is based off of divine revelation, more specifically of the God-Man Jesus Christ. We can trust this truth because of the great witnesses (holy men and women) that have lived and dedicated themselves to that revelation often unto death for the last 2000 years. It is the Apostles and afterward, the Saints who Christ works through. Christ's Church, like Christ himself, is incarnational (exists physically in time and space). It is through His Church, guided by the Holy Spirit, where people can find the fullness of this divine revelation. It it through His divinely appointed Church where Truth is preserved and passed down through the ages.

https://youtu.be/E2x2WTWjcEA

Fenix ammunition accepts bitcoin.

Not a bumper sticker guy but I would.

Ok, so this portion of Acts is the first documented council in Christendom: The Jerusalem Council where St. James (Bishop of Jerusalem), St Paul, St Peter, and St Barnabas as well as other elders (priests) preside over a very important decision in the early Church. I posted this portion of Holy Scripture to show you that there is Scriptural precedence for Bishops and Priests. There are 9 more councils held by the Church that are authoritative and were presided over by Bishops. These councils were not declaring new theology but rather defending the revelation it received from Christ Himself. Here are 7 that most folks are familiar with, the final 2 councils are debated between the East and the West. They primarily cover the filioque clause (and the Son) that the Latins inserted into the Nicene Creed and the essence energies distinction.

1. Nicaea 325 Arianism Christ is fully God

2. Constantinople 381 Divinity of Holy Spirit Trinity affirmed

3. Ephesus 431 Nestorianism Mary = Theotokos

4. Chalcedon 451 Nature of Christ Two natures, one person

5. Constantinople II 553 “Three Chapters” Clarified Chalcedon

6. Constantinople III 680–681 Monothelitism Two wills in Christ

7. Nicaea II 787 Iconoclasm Icons venerated

The same authority you see in Acts is the very same authority (The Church guided by The Holy Spirit) you see in the councils that follow. Additionally, these same councils bring you the canon of Scripture (The protestant canon is not the canon that is eventually confirmed as it is missing the Deutercanonical texts) and the earliest complete list comes from St. Athanasius in the 360s.

Replying to Avatar OgFOMK ArTS

Good thread and discussion. We've reached the point where honestly I would be outside of the scripture and that's not where I am led.

To a Protestant images of Jesus are Iconography and don't take it personally. The very church I have recently joined has images of Jesus in a few places.

Orthodox and Catholic churches have even more iconography and it definitely is against the scripture to do so.

Liturgical is fancy for I'll read this for you.

Christ definitely is against much talking publicly for show.

Matthew 6:5 KJV “¶And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.”

Truly we need to look at the fruit of the messenger.

Matthew 7:15-20 KJV “¶Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.

16. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

17. Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.

18. A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.

19. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.

20. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.”

Look at the places where the church is a powerful

We are not just winging it. We study the gospel and we have made it open source.

Jesus has performed miracles for me this year and he's working through me every day. The Church is the body of Christ and we are party of it. Not in ecumenism but in experience, faith and study. We are also purposely separated to prevent false powerful churches from hiding the Word of God.

Matthew 23:9 KJV “And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.”

That eliminates all the "priests" who want to be called Father and specifically:

Mat 23:9 Byzantine “και πατερα μη καλεσητε υμων επι της γης εις γαρ εστιν ο πατηρ υμων ο εν τοις ουρανοις”

Shared using AndBible: Bible Study. (https://andbible.github.io)

I too will give a response to the rest of your post but this addresses a portion if it.

https://inklesspen.blog/2025/07/21/call-no-man-father-dont-you-read-the-bible-bruh/

Very few

“The Gospel is a harsh document; the Gospel is ruthless and specific in what it says; the Gospel is not meant to be re-worded, watered down and brought to the level of either our understanding or our taste. The Gospel is proclaiming something which is beyond us and which is there to stretch our mind, to widen our heart beyond the bearable at times, to recondition all our life, to give us a world view which is simply the world upside-down and this we are not keen to accept.”

– Metropolitan Anthony Bloom

🔥🔥Blueeeeeeeegrass

This aligns with the prophecies of many modern Saints. There is a group of folks translating and publishing their work.

I should note that this IS NOT dispensational theology/rapture nonsense.

https://eschatonvigil.org/