No doubt …I’m not jumping in to defend Nvk…he has clearly created animosity among some of his peers…still it’d be nice to see a smoking gun on this particular issue

I think coinkite products will suffer due to inferior quality and lack of consistent innovation compared to products like those produced by nostr:npub1s0vtkgej33n7ec4d7ycxmwt78up8hpfa30d0yfksrshq7t82mchqynpq6j even without vilifying nvk…seems like the abandoned @satslink was the beginning of the end for their innovative cycle…just one idgit’s opinion🤷🏽‍♂️

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

That satslink thing is crazy to me. “It’s on the bench”. I don’t know man. Do all the marketing. Show a bit of demos and then leave the customer hanging for years. Weak

Yup…my conspiratorial mind went to govt intervention behind the scenes…it seemed like such a great idea…I’d actually ordered 2 of them🤦🏽‍♂️⭕️

I’ll think twice before giving him sats. Keep in mind this wasn’t a payment in fiat. Sats in advance. It’s appreciating but you still get the purchasing power of the fiat amount 2 years ago. That’s gonna leave a sour taste for a while.

Those sats are probably word 1.7-2x the amount when we gave him the deposit.

And best I can tell we have a store credit not a refund🤷🏽‍♂️

No refund on sats 🥲

Should have given a deposit with a cc

Agreed🤌🏽

The smoking gun is him taking market share through FOSS and then licensing up once critical mass was achieved.

HE TOOK THE DEPOSIT MONEY FOR THAT PROJECT AND RETURNED IT AS STORE CREDIT AFTER HE FAILED TO DELIVER ANYTHING. SHAMEFUL SHIT

I really don’t like that. The sats keep going up in value in his pockets meanwhile we get a store credit for a Q