>when reading individual counter-studies, you need to be able to distinguish between proud lone wolves carrying the Truth, and madmen screaming that «breathing is harmful for health, we just don't understand it yet, and science is silent because it's corrupt»

You're ignoring my arguments, continuing pushing single links, some of which I don't even need to check myself, because *they've already proved as erroneous or even consciously faked data (netsearch about eg. AFLDS on any neutral website).

Usually you're fighting bravely against fakes and manipulations — eg. critisizing big tech or us politics hypocrisy — but you're experiencing denialism with some strongly scientifically proven data. I think, that being libertarian/ancap ain't necessarily requiring supporting all right-wing stuff, including weird conspiracy theories which were proved wrong long time ago yet still having a tiny amount of lunatic followers.

I will read the other links you've sent. In return, I warmly recommend you stepping out of the bubble and checking what any NEUTRAL doctor or study says — not necessarily pro-vaccine, but not anti-vaccine either.

p.s. I am arguing only againt something that has strong, neutral, various, independent proofs — denial of vaccines/masks/covid, pf genocides, of global warming. I don't argue about something like 9/11, because there is NO strong scientific data that it wasn't staged, so I can only tell my humble opinion, not argue