Replying to Avatar cactus

>when reading individual counter-studies, you need to be able to distinguish between proud lone wolves carrying the Truth, and madmen screaming that «breathing is harmful for health, we just don't understand it yet, and science is silent because it's corrupt»

You're ignoring my arguments, continuing pushing single links, some of which I don't even need to check myself, because *they've already proved as erroneous or even consciously faked data (netsearch about eg. AFLDS on any neutral website).

Usually you're fighting bravely against fakes and manipulations — eg. critisizing big tech or us politics hypocrisy — but you're experiencing denialism with some strongly scientifically proven data. I think, that being libertarian/ancap ain't necessarily requiring supporting all right-wing stuff, including weird conspiracy theories which were proved wrong long time ago yet still having a tiny amount of lunatic followers.

I will read the other links you've sent. In return, I warmly recommend you stepping out of the bubble and checking what any NEUTRAL doctor or study says — not necessarily pro-vaccine, but not anti-vaccine either.

p.s. I am arguing only againt something that has strong, neutral, various, independent proofs — denial of vaccines/masks/covid, pf genocides, of global warming. I don't argue about something like 9/11, because there is NO strong scientific data that it wasn't staged, so I can only tell my humble opinion, not argue
Avatar
SimplifiedPrivacy.com 1y ago

There is no such thing as a neutral site.

Notice you did not provide any reasons why these sources such as Dr Peter McCullough are wrong, you just assume the government data is right. And attack McCullough’s bias or “legitimacy”

The main way the left tries to seize power, is by ending discussion of policy, and forcing it to go to “experts”. In other words, “you can’t decide or discuss, you’re not an expert”.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
cactus 1y ago

McCullough actively promotes misinformation about COVID-19, its treatments, and mRNA vaccines:

1) https://www.factcheck.org/2021/07/vaccines-remain-largely-effective-against-delta-variant-counter-to-claims-from-fox-news-guest/

2) https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives/93936

3) https://factcheck.afp.com/http%253A%252F%252Fdoc.afp.com%252F9QW7UP-1

4) https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/vaccines-are-a-safer-alternative-for-acquiring-immunity-compared-to-natural-infection-and-covid-19-survivors-benefit-from-getting-vaccinated-contrary-to-claims-by-peter-mccullough/

right-wing media is an echo-chamber of anti-vaccine fakes: https://www.mediamatters.org/coronavirus-covid-19/right-wing-media-echo-chamber-anti-vaccine-messaging

step out of the bubble — like you've already did with the banks, governments and big businesses. ask me, if you need more debunks of fake news.

you get me wrong assuming that I trust the government: I trust only strong facts. for example, majority of governments try to control the guns, while multiple scientific meta-analyses show us that guns are never raising crimes, but actually protecting the people:

1) https://crimeandjusticeresearchalliance.org/rsrch/impact-of-gun-ownership-on-crime-rates/

2) https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/essays/firearm-prevalence-violent-crime.html