Nostr Web Client

Replying to Noisy signal

Read my note again. I want to understand the following:

1. Why wasn't this addressed in an open forum.

2. This directly affects BTC nodes. What is the impact on them?

3. I sense the deep resentment from both sides and name calling seems to be your response. So

4. Who benefits?

5. Who suffers?

6. Where does it leave the nodes.

The silence is deafening .

Who has the power to force people against their will?

Why is it happening?

What is the future for BTC Core.

ChipButty 3mo ago 💬 1

"The silence is deafening"

Michael Saylor hasn't said anything about it at all. Interesting that someone with such a massive stack of bitcoin at risk should not speak up about it regardless of your opinions of him. I imagine has has a number of nodes running too.

Matt & Marty don't bother talking about it because they understand it's not the problem you think it is.

I'm not here to answer a list of questions you have. Just like the big blockers of 2017 the anti-spam bitcoiners have found an easy to understand solution to a complex problem they don't understand. You would do well to trust Marty & Matt rather than Kratter and the others who are leading you astray. Good luck 👍

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Noisy signal 3mo ago 💬 1

Go find someone else to regurgitate your vitriolic pile of crap.

Andrey Arapov took the time to breakdown and explain both sides of the argument , the impact on the nodes and the longterm intent.

You spent your time using wild accusations and bloated assumptions on who is trustworthy and who is not. It didn't work.

I am not wasting my time with someone who advocates pedophilia. So fuck off.

ChipButty 3mo ago 💬 1

Noisy signal 3mo ago 💬 1

Translation : childrens online safety is an excuse to bring in internet passports. Centralized censorship and spy tactics. A mechanism to scoop up your data, repackage and sell to the Big 7.

No thanks . Bitchat provides a possible solution.

ChipButty 3mo ago 💬 1

Children's safety is being used in Europe as a way to force tech companies to create backdoors in their encryption apps such as Signal and Whatsapp. Many naive citizens in Europe approve of such measures. The tweet above implies naive bitcoiners would approve of the same backdoors if people like Kratter started to push for them in the name of child safety in his dumb videos

Noisy signal 3mo ago 💬 1

China has set the surveillance template. So it is expected.

What people are unaware of - is the coming nanobot tech just through RNA collection. This is diabolical . Follow DARPA and the reasons the US Military are hard out atmospheric seeding. Exposes and exploits humanity to neural linking transhumanism.

I follow Joshua Stylman on Substack - His latest article The Modern Slave should give some credence to why Elon Musk has reservations about AI safety. DARPA, Palantir namely through Peter Thiel, Bill Gates and Sam Altman are pushing this through as fast as they can, before Governments regulate .

It is obvious that you do not take the time to listen and back check Matthew Kratters work. He commands respect . You don't.

I'm not interested in who wins the Core/Knots debate . The Nodes still have the ability to choose confirmation . Regardless of whether the size of the blocks increase.

ChipButty 3mo ago 💬 1

Some people exist by consuming fear. They spend their time reading/watching/listening to media regarding all the horrors that the future will bring. I won't say I am nothing but a total optimist because I like to be grounded but I am certainly optimistic for the future. I do believe we have a decade or so of more turmoil before we start turning the corner though.

Apparently liberals/progressives have higher rates of unhappiness & depression than conservatives. Their constant worries about democracy, fascism, climate change etc affect their mental well being, they spend too much time consuming FUD. Kratter spews FUD. His channel used to be educational, now it is almost exclusively about Core being compromised, CP on the blockchain and all the other BS. It's FUD and his audience is drinking it up.

Noisy signal 3mo ago 💬 1

Some people prefer perspective. Some people prefer perception . One is based on reality. The other is based on assumptions . It is important to know which one is being used, when communicating.

Since Covid lockdown - governments, fake media, Big 7, pharmaceuticals, some influencers have weaponised fear, to control, coerce, manipulate. Electronics are designed to collect our habits, decipher, repackage and auction our data to the highest bidder.

This is happening today - in the real world .

Using general statistics to back your statements on governance , climate change etc implying mental wellbeing deterioration and FUD following is total bs.

Your assumptions are off base.

ChipButty 3mo ago 💬 1

Hopefully you listened to Marty and Matt on RHR this week talk about the big scary spam problem, it might relieve you of your worries. Better listen to them than Kratter, you'll be thankful in the long run, really. Goodbye.

Noisy signal 3mo ago

Why should I ?

I'm no longer worried . Andrey Arapov clarified the Core/Knots issue .

You seem to like dishing out unasked advice. Here's something for you -

understand the difference between perspective and perception.

Because clearly you get triggered over petty trivial issues to feed your clueless ego.