The most efficient choice for nodes is to set their relay policy in line with the network consensus. This is what that article explains and is currently the latest default settings of core.

ask yourself why does Libbitcoin deliberately avoid having any arbitrary/custom relay policy?

And how was it possible for sub-sat “summer” (dust spam / ordinal-style inscriptions) to occur even though ~99% of the network had default filtering rules that should have blocked it?

the answer is adjusting relay policy does not constitute a structural network change because relay policy is a locally enforced preference and has no impact on network-wide behavior therefore = subsat "summer" occurred and occurring to this day bypassing all your knot loving nodes.

Because network behavior is dictated by consensus and economic incentives, not node policy, and most of you refuse to understand how a permissionless free market network actually works.

Transaction data is just arbitrary hashes, there is no way to enforce what you want without some kind of centralized arbiter.

Empirical on-chain evidence of an organic event like sub-sat summer that proves Core's points correct.

What you want and what is reality do not align.

and bip-110 is dead in the water was already bypassed a week after it was released by PeterTodd and proven on chain