For the non-custodial lightning case you kinda need a fixed counterparty, so your options are move or vote. For other use cases of bitcoin this does not apply (but also vote anyway, it doesn’t hurt).

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I always thought the LSP model was a bad idea.

It’s that or custodial, so it seems much better 🤷‍♂️

I use lightning without an LSP, and it works just fine. People just have to use their brain.

I like to think I'm pretty smart. I've had a very hard time running my own LN node. Starting with raspibolt.org my node froze up without me noticing and all my channels were force closed.

Tried again with a small lenovo thinkstation, my ssd Mount didn't persist after restarts, didn't notice for almost a year, again channels are force closed.

I can hear the "skill issue" in the distance. But the truth is running a LN node is hard. Even without the sys admin problems, I never figured out who I should open channels to, how much in those channels to be a good peer on the network. Tbh, I just don't have the time or interest in running a routing node. I much prefer the LSP model.

I use this to find a channel to open with https://bolt.observer/explorer/

The only differences between you and I, is that you gave up where I didn't.

Sadly running a lightning routing node is not the same as an LSP, and more routing nodes doesn’t solve the LSP problem.

You are right. If I want centralization within the lightning network, then I want an LSP.