Only that 0,01 is understandable 0,00000001 is not
(Side quest: can you figure out if I used the correct number of zeros?)
Discussion
You did! What’s your point?
I understand so you mean we should have different names for different sizes of transactions according to the amount of ceros?
I think we should just have one name for a reasonable amount of value and I neither think 100k $ or more is reasonable, nor do I think that a reasonable amount should be called sats, bits or anything else no one cares about.