RFK said all 72 vaccines on the vaccine schedule have never been safety tested. Fauci called RFK Jr a liar. So RFK Jr sued Fauci for proof of testing. Fauci conceded, admitting RFK Jr was right all along.
Corporate media is your enemy.This is called “Manufacturing Consent”:
ATTRIBUTION? LINK?
The majority of people really enjoyed the COVID time and even loved getting the jab in a car park like a junky. Even when they knew it was poisonous. 
No vaccine has ever been tested using real science. You can’t find a single comparative study on vaccines in any reputable science journal.
Im confused about what to believe because he’s also pushing for vaccines isn’t he? Regarding this topic I struggle to find truth. Someone else with the same problem? Someone here who can help? Seeking truth about vaccines for my kid
It's not an all or nothing. Life is about nuance. Being against loading up a 1-month-old infant with 12 shots in one sitting is not the same as being against vaccines altogether.
He's been branded as anti-vaxx but that's not true. His book on the subject is pretty enlightening. I would seriously suggest it for anybody who's genuinely curious about making informed decisions about vaccines for their children.
Thank you for sharing very helpful
And now look who is pushing vaccines—-RFK jr. corporate media is simply the tool of the real enemy. More garbage news from this “network” 🖕🏻
Something to consider which is rarely talked about.
Safety testing is only conducted on adults because it is considered medically unethical to experiment on children.
We know that a child's immune system is has not fully developed, and it undergoes significant changes as a person matures into adulthood.
We also know that a child's immune system responds differently to an adult's with regard to disease. They will even exhibit different symptoms and physical immune response in many cases.
So we have a group of people, whose immune systems have physiologically different immune systems, that also behave in different ways, but we don't know enough about those differences to accurately predict how this complex system will respond in different situations because the ability to study it is limited.
And we choose to take infants, who are on the extreme opposite end of the spectrum of immune system variance compared with adults, and target them for immunization based on an assumption that if it's more or less safe for an adult, then it's equally more or less safe for the infant.
That is terrible science. I would not even call it science.
