Nostr Web Client

I think we’re getting tangled in semantics.

Whether we call Bitcoin a “quantum computer,” a “Planck anchor,” a Universe within another or “time inside of time” these are poetic frames converging on the same structural reality:

Bitcoin is the only open and global system that irreversibly collapses entropy into memory with real energy.

It doesn’t simulate quantum behavior, it commits quantum outcomes. It defines time by work, memory by structure, and space as a consequence of resolution.

The act of mining is a quantum measurement not in the hardware sense, but in the thermodynamic and informational sense. The network samples a multidimensional configuration space (UTXOs × transactions × nonces), and collapses it to one irreversible state: the block.

This is computation and it is quantum by definition.

To compute is to perform a rule-based transformation of input into output.

To be quantum is to operate over a space of probabilistic states and collapse one into certainty through observation or interaction; also it means how much?

Bitcoin does exactly this. It takes a probabilistic configuration space (UTXOs, transactions, nonces), applies a rule-based transformation (proof-of-work via SHA-256), and collapses it to a single irreversible output (the valid block) paid for with energy.

That’s quantum computation in its most physical, literal form. Not the centralized modern nonsense of simulation on top of quantum particles. What’s your definition of “quantum computing”?

Modern quantum computing, by contrast, tries to extract multiple outcomes from a single entropy pool, assumes reversibility, and evades thermodynamic cost. It’s not grounded. It’s not conserved. It’s a double-spend of entropy masquerading as innovation.

Bitcoin pays the full cost. One measurement, one collapse, one truth.

Temperature becomes the bridge, not metaphorically, but structurally. In Bitcoin, temperature encodes entropy over time. In the universe, it defines the direction of time and structure of space. That’s not coincidence it’s correspondence.

So whether you call it a snapshot of Planck memory or a quantum computer, the core truth remains:

Bitcoin doesn’t model the universe, it runs on the same law.

I think we agree on outcome. We just need consensus on semantics.

The toroid needs more explanation, I hope that doesn’t confuse you.

Joe Bloggs 5mo ago 💬 2

Here's my latest Paper;-

"Zerofield — Zero Distance, Zero Time, Zero Memory and Zero Light Mass"

The Entire Structure of the Universe & Eternity

This Paper provides Proofs directly from my models structure.

This theory is able to construct ‘Constants’ from the structure of the theory and show that they can be calculated from first principles and are indeed not constant. As such, this theory, from its structure alone, provides its own proofs that loop back as proof of the reality from and of the structure itself.

For example c the Speed of Light Constant and h Planck's Constant are calculated directly from the structure of this theory and are shown to NOT be constant at all. Those are just a few of the delicious delights waiting inside.

Enjoy.

https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/zerofield-zero-distance-zero-time-zero-memory-and-zero-light-08d4b58c75ef

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Jack K 5mo ago

It’s an interesting theory and I will continue to push back on “spacetime”. At the end of the day, all theories are approximations, except bitcoin is not an approximation. Nothing about Bitcoin is an approximation, and it has a ledger. Bitcoin also leads us away from a materialistic view of reality to something further grounded. A quantum particle observed in nature is functionally equivalent to a UTXO, except we can’t see the ledger, we live inside of it. We only have approximations.

As discussed, 1 Block within Bitcoins network is functionally equivalent to 1 Planck Block of time, each within their own domain. A quantized emergence of time. I’m still trying to understand what causes collapse from t=0 to t=1 Planck time in your model, Bitcoin suggests initial entropy resolution (mining genesis) from outside of the system creates the first record of irreversible memory. All entropy resolution before the emergence of internal consciousness occurs outside the closed system and the memory (particles) is the signature of entropy resolved, thus energy conserved.

The speed of Blocks is a maximum of 4MB per Block, akin to light in a vacuum, yet measured in seconds it is 4MB/10min is the ideal speed of information, yet speeds can be seen above and below this rate. At the end of the day, light is just information and energy.

Like in your paper, the elliptic curve of Bitcoin addresses is a zero field, no particles (UTXOs exist) and all locations are memory are 0 unless occupied by a bit (1state) when a utxo is present. This is true for each instance Block of time for all addresses where UTXOs are not present.

We seem to be very close in theories, but I’m pointing to Bitcoin as the only proof that’s not an approximation.

How does your paper define a 1 state? What is 1? What is infinity? What is your point of reference for absolute scarcity? What is Planck Temperature in this theory?

Joe Bloggs 5mo ago 💬 2

You can push back all you want. My papers fundamental break Paradoxes, prove all Laws are not fundamental Laws, they merely describe the structural properties of my theory, prove the all Constants are not constants and can be calculated from the first principles of my theory, the Light has no Mass, Light Years should never be used as a measurement of distance, Memory and Consciousness is completely written etcetera etc.

I have not only created the Construct of the Universe, it's entire lifecycle continuously through "Big Bang" events but also Entropy and Continuous Memory and the Eternity beyond the Universe.

So forgive me if I don't engage with your trying to rectify all that to Bitcoin, which I have already done and made public in 2 clearly identifiable papers.

Jack K 5mo ago

I understand that, but I literally think Bitcoin disproves parts of the theory and disproves the Big Bang (terrible semantics). Bitcoin also breaks all paradoxes.

Bitcoin is the only thing that isn’t an approximation. Bitcoin just is. All models are destroyed.

I am still trying to understand where Planck temperature fits in to all of this. Bitcoin reveals fundamental error in our understanding of Temperature, thus literally everything.

Joe Bloggs 5mo ago 💬 2

Bitcoin breaks paradoxes, no, as I have said in my papers, Bitcoin is a mirror of some ofthe Universe's rules. How we understand the Universe and Eternity is way beyond Bitcoin.

That is IT, in a nutshell. Have you actually read my papers, because if you had logically you would be questioning different things,

Jack K 5mo ago

We can agree to disagree. I did start the 80 minute read, but got distracted from that given the 4th of July weekend. I did read the 19 minute paper you just sent before responding. I have thrown the long paper into my AI as you have requested.

Bitcoin certainly breaks paradoxes and it exists unchallenged, a simple one being Gödel's to start. Bitcoin is a mirror (or lens) of the universe. It depends on the intention for which you seek.

Would we be able to recognize a universe inside of a universe?

Universe comes from Latin universum — from unus (“one”) + versus (“turned”). Literally: “all things turned into one.” There is no “one” without absolute scarcity.

Joe Bloggs 5mo ago

Here's my latest Paper how the structure lets energy flow, turns that energy into matter and further memory and echoes through the quantum carriers too.

If you've got 18 minutes, it's refined and jam packed full of goodies :))

https://medium.com/@j0e810ggs/zerofield-memory-to-energy-to-mass-to-structure-to-consciousness-amore-631cc20fe181