Discussion
That's a convenient way to dismiss information you don't agree with. Do you have any evidence that the study I provided on how to go about upgrading the blockchain encryption is tainted, or flawed, or in some way inaccurate as a result of some alleged thirst for funding? This study didn't even make any predictions. It was just a study on methods to upgrade the blockchain
I would say efficient rather than convenient. There's too much information in the world to be an expert on and understand everything. The next best thing is to look at the incentives and actions of people who actually have skin in the game.
Ok, this conversation has gotten really dumb, and there's no point in carrying on. I'm just going to bow out at this point.