Agree. I'm more Socially left. Financially right. That said, I'd rather not choose one or two categories to put myself in.
Discussion
Socially Iβm ok with other people giving away my money.
Fiscally Iβm not ok with people giving away my money.
π€¦ββοΈ
You seem to have made both statements about finances when they shouldn't have been. Can you please form a different comeback?
Itβs always about finances.
I get called a voluntaryist or anarchist generally, but truthfully I hate any political label. I don't find value in the labels or division. Politicians and parties are shitcoins.
I am a human. I vote with my money, my time and voice. Those are only votes that actually have a meaningful impart. I live by 2 simple rules, don't hurt other people, and don't steal there shit. I merely expect the same form others, and in turn I leave them alone to live as they choose.
I'm quite happy to give my own money away to those whom I think need/deserve it. I am not at all sanquine about letting politicians buy votes with my money.
From: (ThisIsTheEnd) at 07/08 09:29
> Socially Iβm ok with other people giving away my money.
>
> Fiscally Iβm not ok with people giving away my money.
>
> π€¦ββοΈ
CC: #[4]
CC: #[5]
CC: #[6]
CC: #[7]
I interpret this to mean that you are libertarian, not left. Social leftist would be AOC, someone who wants to cram down a whole new social morality on everyone. A libertarian simply says "I don't give a damn what you do so long as it doesn't affect me."
A social leftist would be very upset with the recent SCOTUS decisions. A libertarian would applaud them.
And then there's abortion... That's neither social left nor libertarian. Rather it's a battle over when a being qualifies for rights.
From: DerekRoss at 07/08 09:26
> Agree. I'm more Socially left. Financially right. That said, I'd rather not choose one or two categories to put myself in.
CC: #[4]
CC: #[5]
CC: #[6]
CC: #[7]