Again you fail to see... You are your own worst enemy. You think you know what's best. I simply don't put myself in a position to decide what is and isn't best. That's not my job. You know who gets to decide what's valuable? The person paying the transaction fee. Stop talking from a place of moral authority. You sound dogmatic.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

You fail to understand what is spam.

I dont need to understand. That's what you're not getting. I don't get to decide. You don't either. Sorry you don't like that.

Sorry, I decide on my Bitcoin Knots full node what is spam. And Bitcoin Knots filters it for me.

You can do that all you want. It won't stop your knots node from storing things you think are spam after those txs are confirmed. I don't give a shit what you keep in your mempool. You're so dogmatic that I follow you when my position is people should do whatever they want to do. Do you understand the difference?

Spam is not going to be confirmed. It will be filtered out.

If they are paying a high enough fee and it is concensous it won't be filtered out. You're kinda defeating the purpose of censorship resistance.

Spam is not concensous.

84 Bytes.

Which would be larger than your 80 byte default filter...

rounding error ... no one cares about rounding error

We speak about the following scenario.

It's not a rounding error. 84 is larger than 80. Data in OP return is not rounded.... It's counted in bytes. You're missing the point entirely.

See, this is now spam. Lets stop it.