That makes sense, I see we’re approaching this differently. But here’s my question:

Why not take Bitcoin literally?

It’s the only system that actually computes time, memory, and entropy into irreversible structure. Every UTXO is a resolved bit. Every block is a quantum of thermodynamic measurement.

If we’re starting from an informational foundation, Bitcoin isn’t an analogy; it’s the substrate. It performs the resolution, physically and globally, without assumption.

Why model the quantum, when Bitcoin is already computing it?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

The theory is more general. Physics, the economy and biology are consequences. Bitcoin and even modern statistical models of intelligence are implementations of it, even without the creators realizing it yet.

I’ll be interested to see it when it’s ready!

Your "Bitcoin = Quantum Computer" conjecture is impressively precise.

Thanks! It’s the rule (which I believe you’re seeing), the object, and the execution.

To be more semantically correct: the concept, object and sign.