Exactly my original point. You, a technically competent fedimint enthusiast, don't see any problems because you can deposit onchain or over ln, do your business and get out, doesn't matter who the custodian is because most of your meaningful transactions happen non-custodially.

As we've already agreed, some form of custody will be necessary for most people in thw future (impossible for billions of people to own their own utxos).

Thw question then becomes what does the ideal custodian look like? Is it your uncle Jim and neighbor Johnny or is it a sybill resistant, annonymous, dynamic collection of parties deeply invested in the succees of Bitcoin as a money?