it's probably possible to build relatively safe nuclear reactors

by that i mean building them about 500 feet underground so that if they melt down you simply evacuate the staff and then detonate pre-installed controlled demolition charges that bury the whole thing

because a reactor has to be relatively close to a major city to be useful yet you have to make sure the city doesn't become uninhabitable if it melts down

basically build it inside a sarcophagus from the start. take any kind of ground water contamination issues into consideration.

in other words i am not against nuclear per se. but before i can support building new reactors you have to show me why what happened in Chernobyl and Fukushima will not be possible in these new reactors.

if you try to build the same kind of shit that already failed twice and simply tell me that those were accidents that won't happen again ... i will power drill your eyeballs out.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Fukushima was the absolute height of stupidity. I will never believe that Japs are intelligent after that. Chernobyl was a mistake but Fukushima was inevitable consequence of obviously bad design. If i was dictator in Japan i would have executed every person involved in the design. How the fuck you build a nuclear reactor in Japan in a zone susceptible to Tsunami ... that is criminal level of stupidity and the only appropriate punishment is death.

Jspan is an oligarchy, not a dictatorship, but impunity for favourites is a feature of both systems.

TEPCO was repeatedly denied regulator permission to upgrade to newer plant designs, so they had to keep their ancient, poorly-sited Gen2 plants running.

That's a level of stupid I previously believed only White ppl suffered from...

Solar power doesn't have to involve young immigrant installers falling from rooftops.

Wind turbines don't have to be sited for bird strikes.

Hydropower dams don't have to be kept sitting disastrously over-full.

Nuclear plants don't have to be designed to be capable of core meltdown (GenIV mostly aren't)

Coal power doesn't have to involve strip-mining, breathing fly ash downwind, releasing mercury and various radionuclides into the environment, or generating mountains of toxic waste.... oh wait actually it does.

yeah you're right implementation matters, but most people only think in binary terms like Electric Good - Fossil Bad.