it's probably possible to build relatively safe nuclear reactors

by that i mean building them about 500 feet underground so that if they melt down you simply evacuate the staff and then detonate pre-installed controlled demolition charges that bury the whole thing

because a reactor has to be relatively close to a major city to be useful yet you have to make sure the city doesn't become uninhabitable if it melts down

basically build it inside a sarcophagus from the start. take any kind of ground water contamination issues into consideration.

in other words i am not against nuclear per se. but before i can support building new reactors you have to show me why what happened in Chernobyl and Fukushima will not be possible in these new reactors.

if you try to build the same kind of shit that already failed twice and simply tell me that those were accidents that won't happen again ... i will power drill your eyeballs out.