At no point did we claim that Mullvad or M247 is a Fed. The claim was that governments tap routers and switches. They can not tap every router on earth. Therefore, they focus on the largest datacenters’ routers and switches. Further, we point out that they respond to the legal court order of the country they are registered in.

Knowing if IVPN uses M247 is public knowledge, they admit to it and it's obvious if you exit the servers from whatsmyip.com and DNS lookups.

My Nostr haters be like:

"Do you really think people give a shit about this level of privacy? Email or VPN server decentralization? Just use Proton or Mullvad"

And my response is:

Do you really think people give a shit about this level of censorship resistance? Social media decentralization? Just use Elon Musk's X"

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I would love to know whether I have a verifiable assurance of privacy, but I don't understand how this is something a VPN provider can guarantee.

I agree. That’s why we have a trustless 2-layer solution. You can keep using the VPN you have, and then create browser-only wireguard or Tor→proxy profiles with us for just $1. Even better without using the sudo password

Still can't see where I can do this.

I'm sorry, I misunderstood your question. You’re right and I’m wrong.

So we are in alpha testing now, if you'd like to participate, please msg on Session or SimpleX to go over install. It's free for alpha, but maybe install issues depending on your distro.

https://simplifiedprivacy.com/contact.html

As soon as the install bugs for each distro are resolved, we can launch beta test. The problem is the dependencies for each distro are different

roger roger