Months ago I posted here a review of Alex Karp’s ‘The Technological Republic’ in which I hinted at the idea that those truly concerned with ‘the West’ should let it go once and for all. Defending something that is already gone is, in my view, pointless. Now I find a similar argument fully developed in this book.

In the present age our aim should be — Paul Kingsnorth writes — ‘to build new things, out on the margins. Not to exhaust our souls engaging in a daily war for or against a “West” that is already gone, but to prepare the seedbed for what might, one day long after us, become the basis of a new culture. To go looking for truth. To light particular little fires— fires fuelled by the eternal things, the great and unchanging truths— and tend their sparks as best we can. To prepare the ground with love for a resurrection of the small, the real and the true.

But first, we are going to have to be crucified.’

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Thanks for sharing this. I'm an avid reader and this is going onto my list. I'm finding it difficult to find interesting things to read these days. While the context of your post around nationalism, I think there is also a broader principle guiding this thinking, namely portability. In a world where geography is the primary underpinning of control, build a life and identity that can move with you. I feel like so much conflict in our age is born from peoples slavish devotion to geography which has been bound to this idea of nationalism. I have BTC, npub, and even my off-grid homestead has been designed in such a way that we can move it on a matter of weeks. Every civilization is destined to fall.