Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar ChipTuner

He has not, I'm aware. Neither have I for the record. But it's not a secret that the application process is not (or was not) straight forward or very transparent. I have also been a critic of those who rely on my GITHUB default branch history as the source of truth of my activity. It's not lost on me that it's likely to get application requests for dead projects, but as a "freedom tech" enthusiast, all of my work is self hosted. I shouldn't be pressured to push to GitHub, nor merge commits to my default branches just to show rabid activity.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzq5455pmtewaacws6a73hxkqkea6fjwcm3keq9vqu3q7930nl4k9aqytkummnw3ez66tyvgaz7tmrv93ksefdwfjkccteqyghwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcqyzrv0c3cdcyj8977d9m5fs5mxmt4cz5t2qapsphg4tudny22ke5ckgxj0hw

Avatar
ChipTuner 1mo ago 💬 1

The point is, I can (and do) produce and share OSS projects that get to users without github in the middle.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
ChipTuner 1mo ago

I also say this as a dev who's working on a git remote server (albeit very slowly) at nostr:npub1s3ht77dq4zqnya8vjun5jp3p44pr794ru36d0ltxu65chljw8xjqd975wz

Thread collapsed