It seems Bill was 100% correct again.
3 questions, 1 answer.
The person that is capable of great violence is the same person that doesnβt want to be harmed.
Discussion
Iβm not as sure as you are that this answers any of those questions
I can expand on it.
What defines great violence?
The amount of defense that it takes stop the threat. Which encompasses talking it out, and includes up to using deadly force.
What difference does this make to people that just donβt want to be harmed?
The way I see it is that the biggest strongest people always are tested. They have seen how violent the world is so they are ultimately more afraid of the repercussions of being violent and or receiving that violence. So the biggest donβt want to harm nor be harmed.
The Napoleon complex smaller and or less accomplished man always wants violence. I βASS-U-MEβ that is because he hasnβt been the receiver nor giver of great violence.
Why great violence? You said it best my friend.
Sometimes people just want to be left alone and donβt want to harm nor be harmed.
AND someone doesnβt want to take the hint.
But that would be speaking for Bill.
Iβm just speaking about me lmao
I apologize. I didnβt realize that you were not a guy until I followed you and read a few posts. This is not an appropriate answer to a lady.
The correct answer to a female is the way I would explain to my lady. Soft and gentle.
I just want my family to arrive back home safe and unharmed. I might not come back, but I will die to make sure that you do. Life goes on without men, but it stops without women.
There was nothing about the tone of your previous answer unsuitable to a lady. This one, however, comes across condescending. Itβs also false β life does not go on without men β and continues to not answer any of the questions I asked.