Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Mike Brock

Here's perhaps the most fundamental point about why I don't tie my political/ideological beliefs close to my sense of who I am: because I'm not personally convinced that I'm not wrong about anything.

I'm a Bayesian. And my political views have shifted in sufficiently dramatic ways quite a few times in my life, that I'm pretty allergic to the idea that I know for certain that my beliefs are correct or optimal.

I am fundamentally open to the idea that I'm completely full of shit. And it's one of the reasons I'm so willing to debate and accept challenge. Out of a principle, I feel committed to the necessity of changing my mind if a better argument comes along.

So restricting myself to people who politically and ideologically agree with me, would cut me off from the possibility of gaining an insight that reveals the wrongness of my beliefs. This, to me anyways, seems stupid on its face.

Avatar
⚡️🌱🌙 2y ago

Optimal politics is situational.

I could think of a dozen issues where I would advocate 1 policy in one country and a different policy in a different country.

Believing in a rigid universal application of a policy (politics) is dogmatic.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Mike Brock 2y ago

We'd probably get along!

Thread collapsed
92
nobody 2y ago

true -

which is different from relativism.

Thread collapsed