Replying to Avatar Xtr3m3hodl

This is interesting because on one hand we've got people on one side of the scaling debate advocating for the ability for everyone to have access to a utxo (full/shared) (onchain scaling) and on the other hand, those advocating for 2nd and 3rd layer solutions to achieve scalability.

If one is saying the only way to achieve mass usage of #bitcoin is through layer solutions (exchanges being one of them), then it would seem #Bitcoin in its current state is good enough since most people won't custody their coins themselves.

interesting observing the dichotomy between the two pov.

nostr:nevent1qqsdadwxew68ydg4j8y3y53f04c3uq4m4tq2vmg62vrv49xv9vnmmkspremhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet59upzqx78pgq53vlnzmdr8l3u38eru0n3438lnxqz0mr39wg9e5j0dfq3qvzqqqqqqy5d4grr

Avatar
BitcoinStu 1y ago

And both are wrong. Bitcoin will scale through custodians, as Hal predicted in 2010.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.