Replying to Avatar π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž

I think it’s flawed at the ground level being us the humans, nobody takes it seriously to vet their follows.. idk how it can work without us first doing that
Avatar
Seth 2w ago πŸ’¬ 1

Irl we don’t β€œscore” numerically, but we damn well score reputationally. I can’t put my finger on yet, but there is *something* there. πŸ€”

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž 2w ago πŸ’¬ 1

Aaaaa so time is the indicator, maybe given a large enough data set throughout time pertaining to behavior being good or bad.. mutes etc

Avatar
π•Ύπ–Šπ–— π•Ύπ–‘π–Šπ–Šπ–•π–ž 2w ago πŸ’¬ 1

but still there’s bound to be cracks they can slip through idk how it’ll ever work, maybe it’s something that isn’t supposed to work? that’s why the best things are trustless? Idk

Avatar
Seth 2w ago πŸ’¬ 1

Dunno. I can say with conviction reputation > score.