Yes.

nostr:nevent1qqsxmxrs5merwjfm298ut6ult922zy6vwkk0spe7fd6sl0cmshpq84spzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtczyr4pummgxaq7cuenk32rl6mfq5rx3akk0uzlzwfgugnt056flcqq2qcyqqqqqqgnv353c

Anarcho capitalism is an oxymoron.

Capitalism is the control of the means of production by the owning class.

Communists seek to remove class.

The most basic understanding of the difference between communism and anarchism is the how.

Anarchists want to destroy the state, and believe that socialism will evolve naturally from there.

Communists believe that the state should be used to build socialism, and reder itself unnecessary, at which point they believe the state will wither away.

Both anarchists and communists have the same utopian end goal of a stateless classless social order where the means are owned and managed by the workers.

With communism also advocating such a social order to be moneyless.

"From each according to ability, to each according to need" is the motto of the gift economy that anarchists and communists support.

Meanwhile capitalism is literally what we already live under.

Personally I believe that Bitcoin adoption will be what destroys modern capitalism.

The central banks that loan money to our governments can not print unlimited Bitcoin like that can with fiat.

There are distinctions between different forms of capitalism, but none of them are anarchist in nature.

Neo liberalism is the type of capitalism you see in USA.

Social democracy is the type of capitalism you see in Scandinavian countries.

Lassie fair (probably spelt that wrong, the one people refer to as free market) is what you typically see in much of the developing world.

Its almost as if complex ecosystems are self regulating thorough positive and negative feedback loops.... 🤔

Even a complete collapse could be considered regulatory if a system has gone so far out of balance it needs replacing with something that fits the niche better.

I believe the focus should be more on the political system rather than the economic system. The state itself and how it functions.

The best political system I have seen in practice is what they had in Libya prior to the NATO invasion.

Direct democracy.

No politicians, no political parties.

Public ownership of natural resources.

They, the Libyan people, under Gaddafi's guidance lifted themselves out of poverty and became prosperous, living lives we in the west could only dream of.

Want to be a doctor? Be a doctor, the people own the university, the fee is the value you add back to society with your work.

Want to be a farmer? Here is some land and seeds, here is some livestock, go and be a farmer.

You just got married? Here is a home ror you to raise your children.

Where does all the money to pay for it come from? Public ownership of natural resources, Libya had oil. Every citizen was treated like a shareholder.

How did Libya make it work?

A small population with a homogeneous society with shared values definitely made it easier. 5 million people is not a large population.

How could we make it work in larger countries? I believe blockchain might be able to facilitate it.

Instead of voting for politicians to make decisions on our behalf, we can collectively make those decisions ourselves.

That's what direct democracy is.

And I believe with Bitcoin as our money, and direct democracy as our political system, that a better economic system will naturally evolve to suit society.

Whatever happens, neo liberal capitalism will die, its the least sustainable economic system the world has ever seen, money based on debt. It will kill itself.

Whether we regress to an older capitalist system or progress into a new economic system time will tell.

We may actually need to regress back to pre 1971 capitalism before we can progress towards socialism or whatever the future holds.