Or as a human thatâs using the free internet as it was intended; free and unfiltered speech. Speech that can only be silenced by those with small minds, those who use their mute button to avoid uncomfortable truths.
Discussion
You're posting misinformation.
Oh, that sounds so creepily dystopian. đ Things are logical or illogical, and facts are more or less accurate.
LOL I was referring specifically to his or her lack of knowledge on nuclear blast fallout and seemingly purely subjective opinion on the whole Palestine/Israel situation.
I haven't muted you. Obviously. I only mute for graphic images, cryptospam, and poorly-programmed bottiness.
I meant that your argumentation is too hollow. As if you we're just repeating things other people have said, that you don't understand enough to defend in an argument.
Very emotive, at any rate. I'm a bit old for that, I'm afraid.
Iâm shallow when itâs needed (most of the time), but can get as deep as you or anyone would like.
The reality is most people are shallow and call any criticism they donât like âbotsâ or âteenage boys,â so they can easily and mentally dismiss information they donât like.
Hmm. I think you need to up your game. The arguments require me to assume that Jooz R Bad, so anything built upon that will be something I find deeply unconvincing because I think the axiom is faulty.
Try figuring out an argument that your audience would agree with, even if you otherwise disagree with your audience. That's something bots and boys can't do.
If you're just playing to a wider audience, rather than engaging in dialectic, then continue on, as is. Of course. It's a free protocol. đ€đ»
Why do you believe the axiom is bad, what have you seen counter to the argument?
If you know a single Jewish person who is not evil, then being Jewish does not directly result in someone being evil. That is then objectively false. So, there must be a more complex situation than Jooz Bad.
If 80/100 view you as cattle, does it matter?
If 10/100 view you as cattle but the 10 collectively own politicians, through bribery and blackmail, and use that leverage to control you. All while the 90/100 quietly support those 10; then does it matter?
Generalities exist for a reason.
You switched arguments. You're now making a political claim, whereas before you claimed something intensic.
This is the much more convincing argument. 2% of people are enough to move politics, so it actually doesn't need to be very many or even a majority, as most people are passive, unsure, or even apathetic.
I suspect both sides of this conflict has a particularly virulent and rabid 2%.
Never switched, youâre changing the argument.
And itâs many more than 2% that view you as cattle.
This is not a convincing argument for me. I'm of West African descent. We're arguably the only group of people more universally-disliked than the Jews. đ I understand people with a chip on their shoulder. It's exhausting being hated all the time, merely for existing.
I doubt you sit around and think, Wow, wish we had a bunch more of them wonderful negroes round here. âș
What fallacy is it when you think a group of people are disliked merely for existing?
You really think thatâs the case regarding jews?
You really think thatâs the case regarding blacks?
You could also make the case that if theyâre not âevil,â then theyâre not actually jewish.