Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar Mike Brock

I'm convinced the most powerful insight that one can have, in order to see the world in the most a dispassionate analytical lens possible, is to fundamentally come to understand where value-judgements enter our human arguments and understanding about the world. These things are what philosophers call normative arguments.

They are everywhere in your thinking.

Every argument you make about politics, economics and culture, has a normative argument hiding in there. No matter how "evidenced-based" or "objective" you think the position is.

When you learn to parse for that, you immediately see through a lot of the narrative-based reasoning traps that people fall into.

But still, no matter how analytical you are, you're going to have to show up with your own normative arguments, yourself. But being aware of them is critical to intellectual honesty.

Avatar
SebastianEspunkt 2y ago

To me the biggest insight is that I would never understand more than at most 1 or two topics really, and deeply. And that this is okay. So I spend a lot of time to understand finance, banking and monetary economics. But I have no opinion on most other matters. I don't consume any news. Feeling much more healthy that way.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.