Subnostr

goatmeal 1y ago

there was a narrative change where people were fooled into thinking it's

technically impossible for lots of people to self-custody small amounts of BTC

even if they wanted to. now lots of bitcoin maximalists sincerely think

sovereignty doesn't matter for balances underneath an unspecified

threshold. the narrative is a lie. you get the narrative if you go balls

deep into a scaling solution built on payment channels. different

scaling solutions like rollups don't have the limitations that payment channels have.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Joda 1y ago

Mostly agree about the narrative. Most hodlers don't even realize they are waiting for a discovery or implementation that hasn't even been devised, and may never be.

Roll-ups will be a piece of the puzzle for sure, but there will be trade-offs. Fortunately roll-ups are all over the place on Ethereum, so a lot of legwork is done .

shortwavesurfer2009 1y ago

That's ridiculous. I should be able to hold one Satoshi and be able to transfer it if I wish in a self-sovereign manner.