Replying to Avatar goatmeal

there was a narrative change where people were fooled into thinking it's

technically impossible for lots of people to self-custody small amounts of BTC

even if they wanted to. now lots of bitcoin maximalists sincerely think

sovereignty doesn't matter for balances underneath an unspecified

threshold. the narrative is a lie. you get the narrative if you go balls

deep into a scaling solution built on payment channels. different

scaling solutions like rollups don't have the limitations that payment channels have.

Avatar
shortwavesurfer2009 1y ago

That's ridiculous. I should be able to hold one Satoshi and be able to transfer it if I wish in a self-sovereign manner.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.