Maybe #[2] can share his block list

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Moreover, are the major relays close to being able ingest a shared source of known spammers? šŸ¤™šŸ¼

I wonder if that ought to be a native concept in Nostr. A blocklist that relays, clients and or users can subscribe to to filter content they receive/store.

Spam is something all relays have to deal with, a curated list perhaps, not an authoritive list

Nothing is authoritative here. :)

So if I’m paying money to run a substantial relay that people ā€œsubscribeā€ to to host their content. I would happily pay a small fee to some Ai wiz that is providing me a list of obvious scammers & and spammers to blacklist and make my processing and storage requirements more efficient. I think that’s where this is going…what does everyone else think?

No doubt. I’m still looking for anyone with sufficient technical depth to say whether or not very well established email anti spam projects like Spam Assassin couldn’t be fitted to nostr.

All this is new but that model seems a reasonable place to go.

Having said that, in some jurisdictions, the relay owner maybe liable for the content on the relay.

All of those Monster drinks while trying to get my relay working really took a toll on me. I had to take the backpack off and my neon green shoes stopped fitting.

šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚

šŸ˜‚ Im just disappointed you don’t have any flair on that backpack.

Yes, makes sense. Free market for censors.