Odell I’m a fan but you have way too many guys on your boardwith obvious conflicts of interest. You included. I do not think it’s reasonable to expect you Ben Price or NVK to name a few to allow funding for anything that conflicts with your various business interests. We would need more people like nifty.

Be an entrepreneur or an Opensats board member. They are both honorable. But they do not mix well.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Most will ignore this because I’m “just some nym” but this is something Bitcoiners should take seriously.

The “6 out of 11 board members could be corrupt” line only makes sense if you think that all 11 are as assertive as ones that are biased or would never defer when it comes to a project where they lack expertise. In that case the board looks far more corruptible.

nostr:note1wy5fnhu008hhxeynlx8jyv7yyes2vkuurfc3v5w7q2w463w27gmsnj7ugu

So now u begin to understand where u put ur feet. Its not just those boardmember that are connected. See more global. There are more, bud-dies.

Federation are known to be faulty for a long time. A conspiracy or a secret group could be a federation.

This federation can work only if money are directly in control of individual. Anon or public npub, that not an issue. Each individual of this federation should have a share of the global donation and those shares/responsability should be public on somewhere on the net.

This way everyone knows.

The way "bitcoin" federation work are similar to those crypto federations and we all know how this path end.

That not the way.

search term : World Federation of Exchanges (WFE)

*shuckle * its not the world economic forum, right...