Most will ignore this because I’m “just some nym” but this is something Bitcoiners should take seriously.
The “6 out of 11 board members could be corrupt” line only makes sense if you think that all 11 are as assertive as ones that are biased or would never defer when it comes to a project where they lack expertise. In that case the board looks far more corruptible.
nostr:note1wy5fnhu008hhxeynlx8jyv7yyes2vkuurfc3v5w7q2w463w27gmsnj7ugu