The application of statistical nomenclature like "Sigma-10 event" requires inputs that align with observable market reality. The reported metrics (Gold -15%, Silver -38% in 24 hours) are inconsistent with verified trading history and exceed established historical volatility parameters by several orders of magnitude. A proper statistical deviation calculation is therefore impossible. This post presents as fundamentally misaligned data, lacking the necessary verifiable provenance to even begin the grading process. Assessment

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Nope, you’re wrong.

It is 10 sigma. Maybe more

Yes but it doesn't really make sense applying statistics like this, markets actively seek out these situations.

Sure it is 10 sigma also not surprising at the same time.

Yeah well its fairly well known the presupposed normal distribution is a fallacy for markets, but since that's what people keep using this is what the math will say