They sure don't seem to have a problem with it. The extent to which they support it is unclear. Knowing how they work, their public articles are likely the tip of the iceberg of their involvement, but that's more of more of a "he who has eyes to see" kind of thing.
They are fighting to get rid of it. They are pandering…
> supports thing publicly, repeatedly
> but that's just because they're trying to get rid of it!!
okay
They’re playing a complicated version of chicken!
Where are you from friend?
Irrelevant. Respond to the point.
You’re not making points. You’re making yourself look ignorant.
My point was that the WEF has publicly supported Bitcoin. Your point was that this means they are somehow trying to get rid of it (???).
I responded by juxtaposing the two stances (public support vs. your claim that this means they are trying to get rid of Bitcoin) to show that it is ridiculous, and you responded by asking me where I'm from instead of showing me that your point is not, in fact, ridiculous.
The ball is in your court, and you are the one making yourself appear ignorant.
They have no control over bitcoin in any meaningful way. No one does. #[11]
